Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Face recognition from research brain PET: An unexpected PET problem.
Schwarz, Christopher G; Kremers, Walter K; Lowe, Val J; Savvides, Marios; Gunter, Jeffrey L; Senjem, Matthew L; Vemuri, Prashanthi; Kantarci, Kejal; Knopman, David S; Petersen, Ronald C; Jack, Clifford R.
Afiliación
  • Schwarz CG; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Electronic address: schwarz.christopher@mayo.edu.
  • Kremers WK; Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Lowe VJ; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Savvides M; CyLab Biometrics Center and Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Gunter JL; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Senjem ML; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Information Technology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Vemuri P; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Kantarci K; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Knopman DS; Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Petersen RC; Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Jack CR; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Neuroimage ; 258: 119357, 2022 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35660089
ABSTRACT
It is well known that de-identified research brain images from MRI and CT can potentially be re-identified using face recognition; however, this has not been examined for PET images. We generated face reconstruction images of 182 volunteers using amyloid, tau, and FDG PET scans, and we measured how accurately commercial face recognition software (Microsoft Azure's Face API) automatically matched them with the individual participants' face photographs. We then compared this accuracy with the same experiments using participants' CT and MRI. Face reconstructions from PET images from PET/CT scanners were correctly matched at rates of 42% (FDG), 35% (tau), and 32% (amyloid), while CT were matched at 78% and MRI at 97-98%. We propose that these recognition rates are high enough that research studies should consider using face de-identification ("de-facing") software on PET images, in addition to CT and structural MRI, before data sharing. We also updated our mri_reface de-identification software with extended functionality to replace face imagery in PET and CT images. Rates of face recognition on de-faced images were reduced to 0-4% for PET, 5% for CT, and 8% for MRI. We measured the effects of de-facing on regional amyloid PET measurements from two different measurement pipelines (PETSurfer/FreeSurfer 6.0, and one in-house method based on SPM12 and ANTs), and these effects were small ICC values between de-faced and original images were > 0.98, biases were <2%, and median relative errors were < 2%. Effects on global amyloid PET SUVR measurements were even smaller ICC values were 1.00, biases were <0.5%, and median relative errors were also <0.5%.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Reconocimiento Facial / Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Neuroimage Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Reconocimiento Facial / Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Neuroimage Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article