Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Machine Learning in the Prediction of Trauma Outcomes: A Systematic Review.
Zhang, Timothy; Nikouline, Anton; Lightfoot, David; Nolan, Brodie.
Afiliación
  • Zhang T; Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: timothymed.zhang@mail.utoronto.ca.
  • Nikouline A; Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Lightfoot D; Health Science Library, Unity Health Toronto, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Nolan B; Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Emergency Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ann Emerg Med ; 80(5): 440-455, 2022 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35842343
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Machine learning models carry unique potential as decision-making aids and prediction tools for improving patient care. Traumatically injured patients provide a uniquely heterogeneous population with severe injuries that can be difficult to predict. Given the relative infancy of machine learning applications in medicine, this systematic review aimed to better understand the current state of machine learning development and implementation to help create a basis for future research. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review from inception to May 2021, using Embase, MEDLINE through Ovid, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and relevant gray literature, for uses of machine learning in predicting the outcomes of trauma patients. The screening and data extraction were performed by 2 independent reviewers. RESULTS: Of the 14,694 identified articles screened, 67 were included for data extraction. Artificial neural networks comprised the most commonly used model, and mortality was the most prevalent outcome of interest. In terms of machine learning model development, there was a lack of studies that employed external validation, feature selection methods, and performed formal calibration testing. Significant heterogeneity in reporting was also observed between the machine learning models employed, patient populations, performance metrics, and features employed. CONCLUSION: This review highlights the heterogeneity in the development and reporting of machine learning models for the prediction of trauma outcomes. While these models present an area of opportunity as an ancillary to clinical decision-making, we recommend more standardization and rigorous guidelines for the development of future models.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Redes Neurales de la Computación / Aprendizaje Automático Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ann Emerg Med Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Redes Neurales de la Computación / Aprendizaje Automático Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ann Emerg Med Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article