Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Rehabilitation and functional outcomes in internally braced and standard ACL reconstructions.
Szakiel, Paulina M; Aksu, Nicholas E; Kirloskar, Kunal M; Gruber, Maxwell D; Zittel, Kyle W; Grieme, Caleb V; Geng, Xue; Argintar, Evan H.
Afiliación
  • Szakiel PM; Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, D.C, USA.
  • Aksu NE; Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, D.C, USA.
  • Kirloskar KM; Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, D.C, USA.
  • Gruber MD; Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Spokane, WA, USA.
  • Zittel KW; Georgetown University Hospital, Department of Orthopedics, Washington, D.C, USA.
  • Grieme CV; Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, D.C, USA.
  • Geng X; Georgetown University Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics and Biomathematics, Washington, D.C, USA.
  • Argintar EH; MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Washington, D.C, USA.
J Orthop ; 33: 95-99, 2022.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35899098
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

The purpose of this study was to compare surgical outcomes in patients who underwent ACL reconstruction, with and without internal bracing, at 1-3, 4-7, and 8-12 months of postoperative physical therapy. Previous studies show that ACL reconstruction with internal bracing allows earlier and more aggressive rehabilitation. Therefore, it was hypothesized that patients with internal bracing would display superior surgical recovery compared to ACL reconstruction alone after adjusting for length of physical therapy.1, 2, 3.

Methods:

Patients who underwent ACL reconstruction and had a minimum two-year follow-up were included. Demographics including age, gender, use of internal bracing, and pre-operative level of activity were collected. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using KOOS scores.

Results:

46 patients underwent ACL reconstruction between January 2013 and December 2015. The mean age was 31.53 ± 8.37 years. Patients who received ACL reconstruction with internal bracing reported similar improvement in KOOS scores (mean = 42.82 ± 15.44; median = 46.39 [34.52-51.80]) compared to ACL reconstruction alone (mean = 38.18 ± 19.91; median = 40.17 [29.49-53.90]) (p = 0.475). Patients who received ACL reconstruction with internal bracing reported comparable improvement to ACL reconstruction alone at 0-3 months (Internal bracing mean = 35.39 ± 15.26, median = 40.45 [26.49-47.73]; No internal bracing mean = 42.51 ± 12.33, median = 39.32 [35.69-52.94], p = 0.4113), 4-7 months (Internal bracing 41.96 ± 14.49, 45.55 [33.94-52.68]; No internal bracing 30.64 ± 32.29, 41.65 [26.17-46.12], p = 0.7491) and 8+ months groups (Internal bracing 63.36 ± 13.06, 63.36 [58.74-67.98]; No internal bracing 47.05 ± 10.14, 47.05 [43.46-50.63]) (p = 0.6985).

Conclusion:

This study demonstrates no statistical difference in functional outcome scores when comparing patients with internally braced ACL reconstruction compared to standard reconstruction. Therefore, the increased structural support provided by use of internal bracing in ACL reconstruction does not afford to quicker improvement in patient-reported recovery.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Orthop Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Orthop Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos