Effects of a serious game on knowledge, attitude and practice in vector control and dengue prevention among adults in primary care: A randomised controlled trial.

ABSTRACT

Objective: Dengue is endemic but vaccination against it is optional in tropical Singapore. Despite vector control measures to curb mosquito breeding, dengue infection continues to be prevalent. A serious game has been developed to raise the community awareness of dengue vector control programme among residents in Singapore. The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of this serious game on the knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) in dengue prevention among adults. It also determined their willingness to be vaccinated against dengue. Methods: A randomised controlled trial was conducted among volunteer adults who were visiting a regional primary care clinic in Sengkang, Singapore. 400 participants were randomly allocated to receive information regarding dengue prevention from either playing a serious game (intervention) or visiting a dengue prevention website (control). Before and after receiving information on dengue prevention, participants completed a self-administered online questionnaire within a two-week interval to assess the KAP score and their interest to vaccinate against dengue. Participants, who played serious game, evaluated the game with the System Usability Scale (SUS). Results: A total of 374 participants, comprising of 178 participants (89%) from intervention group and 196 participants (98%) from control group, completed both questionnaires. 157 (78.5%) participants in the intervention group completed playing the serious game. Participants in both groups had increased KAP score from baseline, but the mean difference in score (SD) was greater when assessing participants' daily practice towards dengue prevention in the serious game group compared to the control group (1.0 (2.8) vs 0.3 (1.9), p = .009). There was a positive correlation (rho = 0.275) between mean change in KAP score and highest achievement attained within serious game (p = .001). The mean SUS (SD) was 61.8 (19.2) among participants who played the serious game. 84.2% of the study population was willing to undertake the dengue vaccination at baseline. Participants in both groups had increased proportion of participants who showed interest in dengue vaccination from baseline but the difference between serious game group and control group were not significant (5.6% vs 2.6%, p = .131). Conclusions: Serious game is at least equally effective compared to conventional web-based learning in promoting dengue prevention measures and vaccination intention among adults, and may be considered as a feasible alternative to digitally engage local residents.