Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Propofol-induced interference with activated partial thromboplastin time-based monitoring of therapeutic heparin anticoagulation.
Negaard, Briana J; Hobbs, Ryan; Frye, Jared R; Merrill, Anna E.
Afiliación
  • Negaard BJ; Department of Pharmacy, Indiana University Health Methodist Hospital, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
  • Hobbs R; Department of Pharmaceutical Care, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.
  • Frye JR; Department of Pharmaceutical Care, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.
  • Merrill AE; Department of Pathology, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 80(7): 445-451, 2023 03 21.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36370416
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) is a coagulation assay commonly utilized for monitoring therapeutic heparin anticoagulation. aPTT methods based on optical detection are vulnerable to spectral interference from hemolysis, icterus, lipemia, and other substances. Intravenous lipid emulsions of primarily 20% have been shown to interfere with multiple clinical laboratory assays, including those measuring aPTT by optical methods, but there is limited data on propofol's effect. The primary objective of this study was to determine the rate of interference of propofol with aPTT measurements in patients receiving both propofol and intravenous heparin.

METHODS:

A retrospective observational cohort study of intensive care unit patients who received concomitant propofol and heparin infusions (N = 38 patients) and whose heparin therapy was monitored by aPTT (N = 531 aPTTs) was conducted. Review of the electronic medical record was completed to obtain relevant clinical and laboratory data, while the laboratory information system was queried for analytical interference with the aPTT assay.

RESULTS:

A total of 109 aPTTs (21%) spanning 21 patients (55%) had documented aPTT interference. All 21 patients had at least one aPTT requiring ultracentrifugation prior to reporting, and 12 aPTTs from 4 patients were unreportable due to interference. Patients with and without aPTT interference received similar doses of propofol. None of the cases of aPTT interference were caused by hemolysis or hyperbilirubinemia.

CONCLUSION:

A potential medication-assay interaction was observed in approximately half of patients who received concomitant propofol and heparin infusions and had aPTT measured for anticoagulation management. Sample ultracentrifugation removes the optical interference in most cases but significantly prolongs aPTT reporting and delays appropriate adjustments to heparin dosing.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Heparina / Propofol Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am J Health Syst Pharm Asunto de la revista: FARMACIA / HOSPITAIS Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Heparina / Propofol Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am J Health Syst Pharm Asunto de la revista: FARMACIA / HOSPITAIS Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos