Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Smartphone-based gait and balance accelerometry is sensitive to age and correlates with clinical and kinematic data.
Olsen, Sharon; Rashid, Usman; Allerby, Celia; Brown, Eliza; Leyser, Michaela; McDonnell, Gabrielle; Alder, Gemma; Barbado, David; Shaikh, Nusratnaaz; Lord, Sue; Niazi, Imran Khan; Taylor, Denise.
Afiliación
  • Olsen S; Rehabilitation Innovation Centre, Health & Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Private Bag 92006, Auckland 1142, New Zealand. Electronic address: sharon.olsen@aut.ac.nz.
  • Rashid U; Rehabilitation Innovation Centre, Health & Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Private Bag 92006, Auckland 1142, New Zealand; Centre for Chiropractic Research, New Zealand College of Chiropractic, PO Box 113-044, Newmarket, Auckland 1149, New Zealand.
  • Allerby C; Rehabilitation Innovation Centre, Health & Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Private Bag 92006, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
  • Brown E; Rehabilitation Innovation Centre, Health & Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Private Bag 92006, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
  • Leyser M; Rehabilitation Innovation Centre, Health & Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Private Bag 92006, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
  • McDonnell G; Rehabilitation Innovation Centre, Health & Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Private Bag 92006, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
  • Alder G; Rehabilitation Innovation Centre, Health & Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Private Bag 92006, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
  • Barbado D; Department of Sport Science, Sports Research Centre, Miguel Hernandez University of Elche, Avda. de la Universidad s/n, Elche 03202, Spain; Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL Foundation), Avda. Pintor Baeza, 12 HGUA, Alicante 03550, Spain.
  • Shaikh N; Rehabilitation Innovation Centre, Health & Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Private Bag 92006, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
  • Lord S; Rehabilitation Innovation Centre, Health & Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Private Bag 92006, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
  • Niazi IK; Rehabilitation Innovation Centre, Health & Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Private Bag 92006, Auckland 1142, New Zealand; Centre for Chiropractic Research, New Zealand College of Chiropractic, PO Box 113-044, Newmarket, Auckland 1149, New Zealand; Centre for
  • Taylor D; Rehabilitation Innovation Centre, Health & Rehabilitation Research Institute, Auckland University of Technology, Private Bag 92006, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
Gait Posture ; 100: 57-64, 2023 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36481647
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The Gait&Balance (G&B) App has produced valid and reliable measures of gait and balance in young healthy adults but has not been tested in older adults. RESEARCH QUESTION In healthy middle-to-older aged adults, are G&B App measurements sensitive to age, valid against clinical and kinematic measures, and reliable?

METHOD:

Healthy participants (n = 34, 14 male, 42-94 years) completed the G&B App protocol three times within a single session. 3D kinematics were collected concurrently. Clinical balance measures were collected (Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction in Balance (mCTSIB), Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test (MBT), and Functional Gait Assessment (FGA)). Sensitivity to age was assessed with Pearson's correlations. Validity tests included Pearson's correlations and Bland-Altman limits of agreement. Reliability tests included intra-class correlation coefficients and standard error of the measure.

RESULTS:

During quiet stance on a compliant surface, the G&B App was sensitive to age-related differences not detectable with the mCTSIB. During walking tasks, there was adequate convergent validity between the MBT and G&B App measures of step length, and between the FGA and G&B App measures of walking speed, step length, and periodicity. The G&B App had moderate-to-excellent validity against 3D kinematics for postural stability during quiet stance (r 0.98 [0.98, 0.99]), step time (r 0.97 [0.96, 0.98]), walking speed (r 0.79 [0.7, 0.86]), and step length (r 0.73 [0.61, 0.81]). Test-retest reliability was moderate-to-excellent for G&B App measures of postural stability, walking speed, periodicity, step length, and step time. G&B App measures of step length asymmetry, step length variability, step time asymmetry, and step time variability had poor validity and reliability.

SIGNIFICANCE:

The G&B App was sensitive to age-related differences in balance not detectable with clinical measurement. It provides valid and reliable measures of postural stability, step length, step time, and periodicity, which are not currently available in standard practice.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Teléfono Inteligente / Marcha Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Límite: Adult / Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Gait Posture Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Teléfono Inteligente / Marcha Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Límite: Adult / Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Gait Posture Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article