Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient-Specific Safe Zones for Acetabular Component Positioning in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Mathematically Accounting for Spinopelvic Biomechanics.
Ramkumar, Prem N; Pang, Michael; Vigdorchik, Jonathan M; Chen, Antonia F; Iorio, Richard; Lange, Jeffrey K.
Afiliación
  • Ramkumar PN; Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School and Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Long Beach Orthopaedic Institute, Long Beach, California.
  • Pang M; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School and Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Vigdorchik JM; Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
  • Chen AF; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School and Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Iorio R; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School and Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Lange JK; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School and Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
J Arthroplasty ; 38(9): 1779-1786, 2023 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36931359
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Despite a growing understanding of spinopelvic biomechanics in total hip arthroplasty (THA), there is no validated approach for executing patient-specific acetabular component positioning. The purpose of this study was to (1) validate quantitative, patient-specific acetabular "safe zone" component positioning from spinopelvic parameters and (2) characterize differences between quantitative patient-specific acetabular targets and qualitative hip-spine classification targets.

METHODS:

From 2,457 consecutive primary THA patients, 22 (0.88%) underwent revision for instability. Spinopelvic parameters were measured prior to index THA. Acetabular position was measured following index and revision arthroplasty. Using a mathematical proof, we developed an open-source tool translating a surgeon-selected, preoperative standing acetabular target to a patient-specific safe zone intraoperative acetabular target. Difference between the patient-specific safe zone and the actual component position was compared before and after revision. Hip-spine classification targets were compared to patient-specific safe zone targets.

RESULTS:

Of the 22 who underwent revision, none dislocated at follow-up (4.6 [range, 1 to 6.9]). Patient-specific safe zone targets differed from prerevision acetabular component position by 9.1 ± 4.2° inclination/13.3 ± 6.7° version; after revision, the mean difference was 3.2 ± 3.0° inclination/5.3 ± 2.7° version. Differences between patient-specific safe zones and the median and extremes of recommended hip-spine classification targets were 2.2 ± 1.9° inclination/5.6 ± 3.7° version and 3.0 ± 2.3° inclination/7.9 ± 3.5° version, respectively.

CONCLUSION:

A mathematically derived, patient-specific approach accommodating spinopelvic biomechanics for acetabular component positioning was validated by approximating revised, now-stable hips within 5° version and 3° inclination. These patient-specific safe zones augment the hip-spine classification with prescriptive quantitative targets for nuanced preoperative planning.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera / Prótesis de Cadera Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Arthroplasty Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera / Prótesis de Cadera Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Arthroplasty Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article