Robotic Retroperitoneal Versus Transperitoneal Partial Nephrectomy: Outcomes and Learning Curve.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: The robotic retroperitoneal approach for renal mass surgery was introduced in 2018 at the Department of Urology in the clinic of Leverkusen, Germany. Clinical criteria for the choice of the access site (trans- vs. retroperitoneal) are not clearly defined. The aim of this study was to explore the learning curve and the impact of the access site on clinical outcome, in order to elucidate which preoperative clinical criteria should be taken into account when choosing the renal approach site. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 107 patients who underwent robotic tumor surgery between June 2018 and March 2022 at the Department of Urology in the Clinic of Leverkusen, Germany. Data from 86 patients with transperitoneal robotic surgery of the kidney and 21 patients with retroperitoneal access were available for analysis. We evaluated the data of patients in a trans- and a retroperitoneal access group. The preoperative clinical data included anthropomorphic data, the Body Mass Index (BMI) as well as the Preoperative Aspects and Dimensions Used for Anatomical Classification of Renal Masses (PADUA) - score. Intraoperative and postoperative data such as blood loss, clamping time, renal function and the learning curve of the surgeons was used to evaluate the outcomes of the two groups. RESULTS: Operation time in the retroperitoneal group was significantly shorter (p=0.015). Operation-specific variables showed no significant difference between the two groups. PADUA score and hilar clamping time showed no difference (p=0.345 and p=0.130, respectively). The learning curve in the retroperitoneal access group unveiled a noticeable difference in the experience and mastery of the involved surgeons. CONCLUSION: Mastery of the retroperitoneal approach is readily possible for surgeons with previous experience in robotic renal surgery without compromising the operative morbidity. The PADUA-score seems most suitable as a preoperative clinical criterion for choosing the renal approach site.