Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A cluster randomized trial to evaluate a centralized remote clinical pharmacy service in large, health system primary care clinics.
Kennelty, Korey; Coffey, Christopher S; Ardery, Gail; Uribe, Liz; Yankey, Jon; Ecklund, Dixie; James, Paul A; Vander Weg, Mark W; Chrischilles, Elizabeth A; Christensen, Alan J; Polgreen, Linnea A; Gryzlak, Brian; Carter, Barry L.
Afiliación
  • Kennelty K; Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy.
  • Coffey CS; Department of Family Medicine, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine.
  • Ardery G; Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health.
  • Uribe L; Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy.
  • Yankey J; Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health.
  • Ecklund D; Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health.
  • James PA; Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health.
  • Vander Weg MW; Department of Family Medicine, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine.
  • Chrischilles EA; Department of Psychology, College of Liberal Arts, the University of Iowa.
  • Christensen AJ; Department of Internal Medicine, Carver College of Medicine.
  • Polgreen LA; Iowa City Veterans Administration.
  • Gryzlak B; Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health.
  • Carter BL; Department of Psychology, College of Liberal Arts, the University of Iowa.
J Am Coll Clin Pharm ; 4(10): 1287-1299, 2021 Oct.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37265855
Background: We developed a remote cardiovascular risk service (CVRS) managed by clinical pharmacists to support primary care teams. The purpose of this study was to examine whether the CVRS could improve guideline adherence in primary care clinics with diverse geographic and patient characteristics. Methods: This study was a cluster-randomized trial initiated in 20 primary care clinics across the US. Clinics were stratified as high or low minority and then randomized to receive the intervention or maintain usual care for 12 months. The primary outcome was adherence to relevant The Guideline Advantage (TGA) criteria met. TGA is a compilation of criteria from practice guidelines intended to improve the quality of primary care. Post-hoc outcomes included changes in individual TGA measures. Results: A total of 401 study subjects were included in the analysis. Mean TGA scores remained the same in the intervention group (n=193, 0.72) and slightly decreased in the usual care group (n=208, 0.67 to 0.66) over the 12-month study period. There was no significant difference between the mean TGA scores in intervention and usual care groups for the overall population at 12 months (0.72 versus 0.66 respectively, p=0.10). For under-represented minority subjects, there was no significant difference between TGA scores at 12 months (n=186; 0.70 versus 0.67, respectively, p=0.50). In a post-hoc analysis of subjects uncontrolled at baseline, there was a significant improvement in systolic BP at 12 months in the intervention group versus usual care (model-based difference of -8.03mmHg, p=0.03). Conclusions: Improvements in individual TGA measures were limited, in part, due to higher than expected baseline TGA scores. Future studies of this model should focus on patients with uncontrolled conditions at high risk for cardiovascular events. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02215408; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02215408?id=NCT02215408.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Am Coll Clin Pharm Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Am Coll Clin Pharm Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article