Degradation of hexavalent chromium and naphthalene by electron beam irradiation: Degradation efficiency, mechanisms, and degradation pathway.

ABSTRACT

Heavy metals (HMs) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in industrial wastewater have attracted much attention due to their damage to the environment and the human body. Studies have shown that there may be interactions between PAHs and HMs, leading to enhanced toxicity of both pollutants. It has been shown that traditional methods are difficult to treat a combination of PAHs and HMs simultaneously. This paper presented an innovative method for treating PAHs and HMs compound pollutants by electron beam irradiation and achieved the removal of the compound pollutants using a single means. Experiments showed that the absorbed dose at 15 kGy could achieve 100% degradation of NAP and 90% reduction of Cr (Ⅵ). This article investigated the effects of electron beam removal of PAHs and HMs complex contaminants in various water environmental matrices. The experimental results showed that the degradation of NAP followed the pseudo-first-order dynamics, and the degradation of NAP was more favorable under neutral conditions. Inorganic ions and water quality had little effect on NAP degradation. For electron beam reduction of Cr (Ⅵ), alkaline conditions were more conducive to reducing Cr (Ⅵ). Especially, adding K2S2O8 or HCOOH achieved 99% reduction of Cr (Ⅵ). Experiments showed that •OH achieve the degradation of NAP, and eaq- achieve the reduction of Cr (Ⅵ). The results showed that the degradation of NAP was mainly achieved by benzene ring opening, carboxylation and aldehyde, which proved that the degradation of NAP was mainly caused by •OH attack. The toxicity analysis results showed that the electron beam could significantly reduce the toxicity of NAP, and the toxicity of the final product was much lower than NAP, realizing the harmless treatment of NAP. The experimental results showed that electron beam irradiation has faster degradation rates and higher degradation efficiency for NAP and Cr (Ⅵ) compared to other reported treatment methods.