Does disc distraction after cervical total disc arthroplasty impact range of motion and patient-reported outcomes?

OBJECTIVE: Total disc arthroplasty (TDA) has been established as a safe and effective alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical spine pathology. However, there remains a paucity of studies in the literature regarding the amount of disc height distraction that can be tolerated, as well as its impact on kinematic and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Patients who underwent 1- or 2-level cervical TDA with a minimum follow-up of 1 year with lateral flexion/extension and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were included. Middle disc space height was measured on preoperative and 6-week postoperative lateral radiographs to quantify the magnitude of disc space distraction, and patients were grouped into < 2-mm distraction and > 2-mm distraction groups. Radiographic outcomes included operative segment lordosis, segmental range of motion (ROM) on flexion/extension, cervical (C2-7) ROM on flexion/extension, and heterotopic ossification (HO). General health and disease-specific PROMs were compared at the preoperative, 6-week, and final postoperative time points. The independent-samples t-test and chi-square test were used to compare outcomes between groups, while multivariate linear regression was used to adjust for baseline differences. RESULTS: Fifty patients who underwent cervical TDA at 59 levels were included in the analysis. Distraction < 2 mm was seen at 30 levels (50.85%), while distraction > 2 mm was observed at 29 levels (49.15%). Radiographically, after adjustment for baseline differences, C2-7 ROM was significantly greater in the patients who underwent TDA with < 2-mm disc space distraction at final follow-up (51.35° ± 13.76° vs 39.19° ± 10.52°, p = 0.002), with a trend toward significance in the early postoperative period. There were no significant postoperative differences in segmental lordosis, segmental ROM, or HO grades. After the authors controlled for baseline differences, < 2-mm distraction of the disc space led to significantly greater improvement in visual analog scale (VAS)-neck scores at 6 weeks (-3.68 ± 3.12 vs -2.24 ± 2.70, p = 0.031) and final follow-up (-4.59 ± 2.74 vs -1.70 ± 3.03, p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with < 2-mm disc height difference had increased C2-7 ROM at final follow-up and significantly greater improvement in neck pain after controlling for baseline differences. Limiting differences in disc space height to < 2 mm affected C2-7 ROM but not segmental ROM, suggesting that less distraction may result in more harmonious kinematics between all cervical levels.