Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Maxillary labial peri-implant hard and soft tissue alteration observed on cross-sectional dimension: a 2-year prospective observational study.
Yamada, Shuhei; Nakano, Tamaki; Kobayashi, Tomoyuki; Ishigaki, Shoichi.
Afiliación
  • Yamada S; Department of Fixed Prosthodontics and Orofacial Function, Osaka University Graduate School of Dentistry, 1-8 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
  • Nakano T; Department of Fixed Prosthodontics and Orofacial Function, Osaka University Graduate School of Dentistry, 1-8 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan. nakano.tamaki.dent@osaka-u.ac.jp.
  • Kobayashi T; Department of Fixed Prosthodontics and Orofacial Function, Osaka University Graduate School of Dentistry, 1-8 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
  • Ishigaki S; Department of Fixed Prosthodontics and Orofacial Function, Osaka University Graduate School of Dentistry, 1-8 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Int J Implant Dent ; 9(1): 16, 2023 Jun 23.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37351804
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate how peri-implant hard and soft tissue height (BH, MH) alter after final prostheses placement related to labial hard and soft tissue thickness (BW, MW). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five platform-switched implants were classified into four groups according to BW and MW: type 1 (thick BW and thick MW), type 2 (thick BW and thin MW), type 3 (thin BW and thick MW), type 4 (thin BW and thin MW). Tissue resorption was evaluated on cone-beam CT images taken at final prostheses placement, at 1-year follow-up, and at 2-year follow-up. Kruskal-Wallis test and post hoc Mann-Whitney test were applied; significance was set to 0.05. RESULTS: BH resorption was 0.13 ± 0.12 mm in type 1, 0.26 ± 0.17 mm in type 2, 0.09 ± 0.09 mm in type 3, 0.94 ± 0.19 mm in type 4. Differences between type 1 and 4, type 2 and 4, and type 3 and 4 were statistically significant (p < 0.001, p = 0.005, p < 0.001, respectively). MH resorption was 0.10 ± 0.09 mm in type 1, 0.36 ± 0.16 mm in type 2, 0.12 ± 0.12 mm in Type 3, 0.79 ± 0.23 mm in type 4. Differences between type 1 and 2, type 1 and 4, type 2 and 3, type 2 and 4 and type 3 and 4 were statistically significant (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Significantly less BH/MH resorption occurs around implants with thick BW/MW than those with thin BW/MW in 2 years. Implants with thick peri-implant soft tissue resulted in significantly less tissue resorption in second year after final prostheses placement.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Oseointegración / Arcada Parcialmente Edéntula / Implantación Dental Endoósea Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Int J Implant Dent Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Oseointegración / Arcada Parcialmente Edéntula / Implantación Dental Endoósea Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Int J Implant Dent Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón