Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
STEM and Non-STEM Misconceptions About Evolution: Findings from 5 Years of Data.
Archila, Pablo Antonio; Restrepo, Silvia; Truscott de Mejía, Anne-Marie; Molina, Jorge.
Afiliación
  • Archila PA; Vice-Presidency of Research and Creation, Universidad de los Andes, Cra 1 Nº 18A-12, 111711 Bogotá, Colombia.
  • Restrepo S; Vice-Presidency of Research and Creation, Universidad de los Andes, Cra 1 Nº 18A-12, 111711 Bogotá, Colombia.
  • Truscott de Mejía AM; School of Education, Universidad de los Andes, Cra 1 Nº 18A-12, 111711 Bogotá, Colombia.
  • Molina J; Department of Biological Sciences, Universidad de los Andes, Cra 1 Nº 18A-12, 111711 Bogotá, Colombia.
Sci Educ (Dordr) ; : 1-19, 2023 Mar 27.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37359257
Even though it is widely held that the theory of evolution is one of the pillars of the biological sciences, as we begin the third decade of the twenty-first century, it is alarming how little we know about science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) majors and non-STEM majors' misconceptions about evolution in countries such as Brazil, Chile, Colombia, and Greece, to name a few. The situation is even more complicated if we acknowledge that contemporary educational approaches (e.g., student-centered learning) mean that students' misconceptions are one of the multiple aspects that influence the construction of meaningful learning. Here, we present a picture of Colombian STEM/non-STEM majors' misconceptions about evolution. Participants were 547 students from different STEM/non-STEM majors (278 females and 269 males, 16-24 years old). During 5 years (10 academic semesters), data were collected from students' responses to an 11-item questionnaire administered in a Colombian university. We hypothesized that the academic semester within these 5 years in which each student completed the instrument as well as respondents' age, gender, and/or major may influence their misconceptions about evolution. Results reveal that participants had a moderate understanding of evolution. Also, we found a limited understanding of microevolution among participants. Furthermore, cross-sectional analyses of differences in undergraduates' responses across demographic variables showed that despite apparent differences, these were not reliable since the differences were not statistically significant. Implications for evolution education are discussed.

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Sci Educ (Dordr) Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Colombia

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Sci Educ (Dordr) Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Colombia