Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Effectiveness of Ultraviolet Smart D60 in Reducing Contamination of Flexible Fiberoptic Laryngoscopes.
Ezeh, Uche C; Achlatis, Efstratios; Crosby, Tyler; Kwak, Paul E; Phillips, Michael S; Amin, Milan R.
Afiliación
  • Ezeh UC; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.
  • Achlatis E; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.
  • Crosby T; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.
  • Kwak PE; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.
  • Phillips MS; Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
  • Amin MR; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.
Laryngoscope ; 133(12): 3512-3519, 2023 12.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37485725
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To compare the effectiveness of disinfection protocols utilizing a ultraviolet (UV) Smart D60 light system with Impelux™ technology with a standard Cidex ortho-phthalaldehyde (OPA) disinfection protocol for cleaning flexible fiberoptic laryngoscopes (FFLs).

METHODS:

Two hundred FFLs were tested for bacterial contamination after routine use, and another 200 FFLs were tested after disinfection with one of four

methods:

enzymatic detergent plus Cidex OPA (standard), enzymatic detergent plus UV Smart D60, microfiber cloth plus UV Smart D60, and nonsterile wipe plus UV Smart D60. Pre- and post-disinfection microbial burden levels and positive culture rates were compared using Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA and Fisher's two-sided exact, respectively.

RESULTS:

After routine use, approximately 56% (112/200) of FFLs were contaminated, with an average contamination level of 9,973.7 ± 70,136.3 CFU/mL. The standard reprocessing method showed no positive cultures. The enzymatic plus UV, microfiber plus UV, and nonsterile wipe plus UV methods yielded contamination rates of 4% (2/50), 6% (3/50), and 12% (6/50), respectively, with no significant differences among the treatment groups (p > 0.05). The pre-disinfection microbial burden levels decreased significantly after each disinfection technique (p < 0.001). The average microbial burden recovered after enzymatic plus UV, microfiber plus UV, and nonsterile wipe plus UV were 0.40 CFU/mL ± 2, 0.60 CFU/mL ± 2.4, and 12.2 CFU/mL ± 69.5, respectively, with no significant difference among the treatment groups (p > 0.05). Micrococcus species (53.8%) were most frequently isolated, and no high-concern organisms were recovered.

CONCLUSION:

Disinfection protocols utilizing UV Smart D60 were as effective as the standard chemical disinfection protocol using Cidex OPA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE NA Laryngoscope, 1333512-3519, 2023.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Laringoscopios Tipo de estudio: Guideline Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Laryngoscope Asunto de la revista: OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Laringoscopios Tipo de estudio: Guideline Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Laryngoscope Asunto de la revista: OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos