Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prediction performance of the machine learning model in predicting mortality risk in patients with traumatic brain injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wang, Jue; Yin, Ming Jing; Wen, Han Chun.
Afiliación
  • Wang J; Department of Emergency, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, 530021, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
  • Yin MJ; Department of Emergency, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, 530021, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
  • Wen HC; Department of Emergency, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, 530021, Nanning, Guangxi, China. 1064243520@qq.com.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak ; 23(1): 142, 2023 07 29.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37507752
PURPOSE: With the in-depth application of machine learning(ML) in clinical practice, it has been used to predict the mortality risk in patients with traumatic brain injuries(TBI). However, there are disputes over its predictive accuracy. Therefore, we implemented this systematic review and meta-analysis, to explore the predictive value of ML for TBI. METHODOLOGY: We systematically retrieved literature published in PubMed, Embase.com, Cochrane, and Web of Science as of November 27, 2022. The prediction model risk of bias(ROB) assessment tool (PROBAST) was used to assess the ROB of models and the applicability of reviewed questions. The random-effects model was adopted for the meta-analysis of the C-index and accuracy of ML models, and a bivariate mixed-effects model for the meta-analysis of the sensitivity and specificity. RESULT: A total of 47 papers were eligible, including 156 model, with 122 newly developed ML models and 34 clinically recommended mature tools. There were 98 ML models predicting the in-hospital mortality in patients with TBI; the pooled C-index, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.86 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.87), 0.79 (95% CI: 0.75, 0.82), and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86, 0.92), respectively. There were 24 ML models predicting the out-of-hospital mortality; the pooled C-index, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.83 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.85), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.67, 0.81), and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.66, 0.82), respectively. According to multivariate analysis, GCS score, age, CT classification, pupil size/light reflex, glucose, and systolic blood pressure (SBP) exerted the greatest impact on the model performance. CONCLUSION: According to the systematic review and meta-analysis, ML models are relatively accurate in predicting the mortality of TBI. A single model often outperforms traditional scoring tools, but the pooled accuracy of models is close to that of traditional scoring tools. The key factors related to model performance include the accepted clinical variables of TBI and the use of CT imaging.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Asunto de la revista: INFORMATICA MEDICA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Asunto de la revista: INFORMATICA MEDICA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China