Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Factors Related to Job Satisfaction in Urology.
Pruthi, Nicholas R; Deal, Allison; Langston, Joshua; Kirby, E Will; Gonzalez, Christopher; McKenna, Patrick; Nielsen, Matthew E; Smith, Angela B; Pruthi, Raj S.
Afiliación
  • Pruthi NR; Department of Urology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  • Deal A; Department of Urology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  • Langston J; Department of Urology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  • Kirby EW; Department of Urology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  • Gonzalez C; Department of Urology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  • McKenna P; Department of Urology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  • Nielsen ME; Department of Urology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  • Smith AB; Department of Urology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  • Pruthi RS; Department of Urology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Urol Pract ; 3(3): 169-174, 2016 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37592531
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

There is little information on job satisfaction in the extant literature in urology. The purpose of this study is to examine 1) the current state of job satisfaction among urologists in the United States, and 2) the demographic and work place factors that have the greatest influence on satisfaction.

METHODS:

We collaborated with AUA (American Urological Association) to query its domestic membership of practicing urologists regarding socioeconomic, work force and quality of life issues. A total of 848 responses were collected for a total response rate of 13%. Linear regression models were used to evaluate bivariable and multivariable associations with job satisfaction scores on a 1 to 5 scale.

RESULTS:

Of providers 70% reported being satisfied, 63% reported that they would choose medicine again and 83% would choose urology again. Age and job satisfaction did not demonstrate a linear association on statistical analysis but rather a U-shaped relationship. On bivariate analysis significant factors associated with higher job satisfaction included younger and older age, higher income (p = 0.047), fewer call days (p = 0.006), fellowship training (p = 0.006) and academic practice (overall p = 0.002). On multivariate analysis age (younger and older ages) and academic practice remained significant predictors of job satisfaction (p = 0.01) as did higher income (p = 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS:

The current study helps describe the current state of job satisfaction among American urologists and examined work place factors that influence satisfaction. Income, hours worked, academic practice and age each have a significant impact on job satisfaction for the practicing urologist. Keeping abreast of the drivers of job satisfaction is critical to ensure that urologists continue to care for patients, perform research, educate future physicians and provide service to their communities.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Urol Pract Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Urol Pract Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article