Assessing Complication Risk of Pressure Equalizing Tube Placement in Children With Velocardiofacial Syndrome (22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome/DiGeorge Syndrome).

INTRODUCTION: Persistent tympanic membrane perforation is a known complication of pressure-equalizing (PE) tube insertion. Conductive hearing loss and otorrhea can necessitate surgical repair of these perforations. Long-term tympanostomy tube placement can increase the risk of these complications. Patients with velocardiofacial syndrome (VCFS) typically require prolonged PE tube placement and are thought to have higher risk of requiring additional otologic interventions after PE tube placement. To date, no work has established rates of post-PE tube complications requiring myringoplasty or tympanoplasty in patients with VCFS. METHODS: A retrospective case review including all patients with VCFS at a single large children's hospital between the years 2000 and 2020 was performed. Number of PE tube insertions required and additional otologic interventions performed were the primary endpoints assessed. RESULTS: Of 212 total patients with VCFS, 66 (31%) underwent PE tube placement. Of these children, 46 (70%) required 2 or more sets of PE tubes. A total of 53 patients (80.3%) required no otologic interventions apart from PE tube insertions. Of the 13 patients (19.7%) requiring additional otologic surgery, 6 (9.5%) underwent myringoplasty, and 9 patients (13.6%) required tympanoplasty. There was no significant difference in tympanoplasty (P > 1), myringoplasty (P > 1), or other surgical intervention rates (P = .7464) between VCFS patients with any type of cleft palate versus those with anatomically normal palates. CONCLUSION: This work suggests that most VCFS patients that require tubes, require at least 2 sets of PE tubes, and that the rate of post-PE tube complications requiring further otologic surgery is an order of magnitude higher than the rate established at this institution. Counseling for PE tube placement in VCFS patients may require specific dialogue regarding the substantially increased risk of complications and effort to build appropriate expectations for surgical outcomes regardless of palatal status.