Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of Two Different Methods for ProSealTM Laryngeal Mask Fixation.
Atar, Funda; Keskin, Gülsen; Karaca Akaslan, Filiz; Tiras, Yasemin; Dönmez, Asli.
Afiliación
  • Atar F; Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Etlik City Hospital, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Keskin G; Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Etlik City Hospital, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Karaca Akaslan F; Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Etlik City Hospital, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Tiras Y; Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Etlik City Hospital, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Dönmez A; Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Etlik City Hospital, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Ankara, Turkey.
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim ; 51(5): 395-401, 2023 Oct 24.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37876165
Objective: This prospective randomized study compared 2 different methods for ProsealTM Laryngeal Mask Airway (PLMA) fixation. Methods: Patients scheduled for ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy surgery in the lithotomy position were included in the study. General anaesthesia with PLMA was administered to the patients. To achieve PLMA fixation, patients were randomly assigned to either adjustable elastic band (Group I) or adhesive tape fixation (Group II). Fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) evaluation and glottic image grading (grade 1-4) and lip margin distances of PLMA (M1 and M2) were evaluated before and after the surgical procedure. Results: We enrolled 116 patients. Surgery of 7 patients was postponed. PLMA dislocated in 2 patients in group II during positioning. For another patient who used adhesive tape in Group II, it was removed because it could not adhere to properly, and a new sticking plaster was used. The study was completed with 106 patients. In FOB evaluation, the number of patients with optimal FOB grade (FOB grade 1) after PLMA was inserted and fixed was more in Group I than in Group II (P = 0.01). FOB evaluation was repeated at the end of the operation, and the number of patients with the worst FOB grade (FOB grade 4) was 0 (0%) and 11 (10.5%) in Groups I and II, respectively. PLMA displaced more than 1 cm in 10 (18.9%) patients in Group I and in 30 patients (56.6%) in Group II. Conclusion: The adjustable elastic band method is simple, easy, and convenient and can be used in any surgical procedure for PLMA fixation.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Turquía

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Turquía