Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence-Based Technologies for the Diagnosis of Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Manetas-Stavrakakis, Nikolaos; Sotiropoulou, Ioanna Myrto; Paraskevas, Themistoklis; Maneta Stavrakaki, Stefania; Bampatsias, Dimitrios; Xanthopoulos, Andrew; Papageorgiou, Nikolaos; Briasoulis, Alexandros.
Afiliación
  • Manetas-Stavrakakis N; Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 157 28 Athens, Greece.
  • Sotiropoulou IM; Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 157 28 Athens, Greece.
  • Paraskevas T; Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Patras, 265 04 Patras, Greece.
  • Maneta Stavrakaki S; Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London SW7 2BX, UK.
  • Bampatsias D; Division of Cardiology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
  • Xanthopoulos A; Department of Cardiology, University of Thessaly, 382 21 Larissa, Greece.
  • Papageorgiou N; Barts Health NHS Trust, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London EC1A 7BE, UK.
  • Briasoulis A; Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 157 28 Athens, Greece.
J Clin Med ; 12(20)2023 Oct 17.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37892714
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia with a high burden of morbidity including impaired quality of life and increased risk of thromboembolism. Early detection and management of AF could prevent thromboembolic events. Artificial intelligence (AI)--based methods in healthcare are developing quickly and can be proved as valuable for the detection of atrial fibrillation. In this metanalysis, we aim to review the diagnostic accuracy of AI-based methods for the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation. A predetermined search strategy was applied on four databases, the PubMed on 31 August 2022, the Google Scholar and Cochrane Library on 3 September 2022, and the Embase on 15 October 2022. The identified studies were screened by two independent investigators. Studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of AI-based devices for the detection of AF in adults against a gold standard were selected. Qualitative and quantitative synthesis to calculate the pooled sensitivity and specificity was performed, and the QUADAS-2 tool was used for the risk of bias and applicability assessment. We screened 14,770 studies, from which 31 were eligible and included. All were diagnostic accuracy studies with case-control or cohort design. The main technologies used were: (a) photoplethysmography (PPG) with pooled sensitivity 95.1% and specificity 96.2%, and (b) single-lead ECG with pooled sensitivity 92.3% and specificity 96.2%. In the PPG group, 0% to 43.2% of the tracings could not be classified using the AI algorithm as AF or not, and in the single-lead ECG group, this figure fluctuated between 0% and 38%. Our analysis showed that AI-based methods for the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation have high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of AF. Further studies should examine whether utilization of these methods could improve clinical outcomes.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Grecia

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Grecia