Surgical management of vocal cord nodules in children: Trends and outcomes.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Vocal cord nodules (VCNs) are the most common cause of dysphonia in school-aged children, with potential negative impacts on quality of life including diminished self-esteem and academic performance. The standard of care for VCNs is conservative management which ranges from voice hygiene to speech therapy with a focus on voice otherwise known as voice therapy, with surgical excision reserved for refractory cases. Thus, few studies have analyzed outcomes of surgical management of VCNs. The purpose of this study is to assess the prevalence and efficacy of surgical excision of VCNs when compared to speech therapy. METHODS: Children with VCNs seen at a single tertiary care institution between 2015 and 2020 were identified by ICD-9 code 478.5 and ICD-10 code J38.2. Demographics, objective voice assessment, intervention, and follow-up assessment data were reviewed. Frequencies, medians, and interquartile ranges were calculated. Time to resolution and improvement were assessed by Cox proportional hazards model. Univariate logistic regression was performed. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Three hundred sixty-eight patients diagnosed with VCNs were identified. 169 patients received intervention for VCNs, with 159 (43.2 %) receiving speech therapy alone and 5 (1.4 %) receiving surgery alone. On bivariate analysis, there was no significant difference in demographic features between treatment groups, however speech therapy patients did have a longer follow-up time. 154 patients underwent objective voice assessment at the time of VCN diagnosis. Among these patients, 95 (61.7 %) received speech therapy and 59 (40.3 %) received no intervention. Speech therapy patients had significantly higher pVHI scores, however there was no significant difference in CAPE-V Overall Severity scores or computerized voice assessment analysis. On Cox proportional hazards analysis, surgical intervention was associated with faster resolution and faster improvement of dysphonic symptoms. On binary logistic regression, surgery was associated with a significantly greater proportion of patients reporting resolution of dysphonic symptoms, however there was no significant difference in proportion of patients reporting improvement of dysphonia. CONCLUSION: For most patients with VCNs, conservative measures such as voice hygiene and speech therapy remain first line, however certain patients may benefit from the rapid improvement and resolution of symptoms that surgical intervention may provide.