Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Optimizing Patient Outcomes in Spinal Surgery: An Investigation Into Anesthesiologists' Case Volume.
Rana, Parimal; Brennan, Jane C; Johnson, Andrea H; Turcotte, Justin J; Patton, Chad.
Afiliación
  • Rana P; Surgical Research, Luminis Health Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, USA.
  • Brennan JC; Surgical Research, Luminis Health Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, USA.
  • Johnson AH; Orthopedics, Luminis Health Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, USA.
  • Turcotte JJ; Surgical Research, Luminis Health Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, USA.
  • Patton C; Orthopedic Surgery, Luminis Health Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, USA.
Cureus ; 15(11): e49559, 2023 Nov.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38156156
ABSTRACT
Introduction Nearly one million patients in the United States undergo spine surgical procedures annually to seek relief from chronic back and neck pain. A multidisciplinary approach is key to ensuring the efficiency and safety of the surgical process, with the anesthesia team, nursing, surgeon, and healthcare facilities all playing a role. The purpose of this study is to capture potential associations between the anesthesiologists' case volume and patient postoperative outcomes in the early recovery period. Methods A retrospective review of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), lumbar decompression (LD), and lumbar fusion (LF) patients from July 2019 to June 2023 was performed. Anesthesiologists were categorized into low, medium, and high volumes of spine surgical cases. Univariate analysis was performed on patient demographics, intraoperative measures, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) measures, and postoperative measures by anesthesiologist volume. Results This study included 545 ACDF, 815 LD, and 1,144 LF patients. There were no differences between groups in ACDF patients by anesthesiologist volume. When examining patients undergoing LD, there was a difference in patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification of three or greater (low volume 41.7% vs. medium volume 53.7% vs. high volume 45.0%; p=0.029). When examining patients undergoing LF, there were differences in patients with low temperatures in PACU (low volume 2.8% vs. medium volume 7.3% vs. high volume 4.2%; p=0.044) and the percentage of patients with a 90-day emergency department return (low volume 7.7% vs. medium volume 11.9% vs. high volume 7.0%; p=0.024). Conclusion While this study found a minimal impact of anesthesiologist volume on postoperative outcomes, recent literature has emphasized the critical role of teamwork and specialized surgical teams to enhance efficiency and patient care. Further studies are warranted to identify other variables in anesthesia, nursing, and surgical team workflow that may impact postoperative outcomes in spinal surgeries.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cureus Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cureus Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos