Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Risk Factor Analysis of Lymph Node Metastasis for Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors: Who Needs a Radical Resection in Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors Sized 1-2 cm?
Choi, Jin Sun; Kim, Min Jung; Shin, Rumi; Park, Ji Won; Heo, Seung Chul; Jeong, Seung-Yong; Park, Kyu Joo; Ryoo, Seung-Bum.
Afiliación
  • Choi JS; Department of Surgery, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim MJ; Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Shin R; Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Park JW; Department of Surgery, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Heo SC; Department of Surgery, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Jeong SY; Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Park KJ; Department of Surgery, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Ryoo SB; Department of Surgery, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 31(4): 2414-2424, 2024 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38194045
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) have malignant potential, and lymph node (LN) or distant metastases can occur; however, treatment of NETs 1-2 cm in size is controversial.

OBJECTIVE:

This study aimed to identify predictive factors for LN metastasis and prognostic factors for recurrence of rectal NETs, especially tumors 1‒2 cm in size.

METHODS:

Between October 2004 and November 2020, 453 patients underwent endoscopic or surgical treatment for rectal NETs in Seoul National University Hospital. The data on these patients were prospectively collected in our database and reviewed retrospectively. In cases of local excision, we evaluated LN metastasis with radiologic imaging, including computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging before treatment and during the follow-up periods.

RESULTS:

LN metastasis was observed in 40 patients (8.8%). A higher rate of LN metastasis was observed in larger-sized tumors, advanced T stage, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), perineural invasion (PNI), and high tumor grade. In multivariable analysis, the significant risk factors for LN metastasis were tumor size (1 ≤ size < 2 cm hazard ratio [HR] 64.07; size ≥2 cm HR 102.37, p < 0.001) and tumor grade (G2 HR 3.63, p = 0.034; G3 HR 5.09, p = 0.044). In multivariable analysis for tumors 1-2 cm in size, the risk factor for LN metastasis was tumor grade (G2 HR 6.34, p = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS:

Tumor grade and size are important predictive factors for LN metastasis. In NETs 2 cm in size, tumor grade is also important for LN metastasis, and radical resection should be considered.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias del Recto / Tumores Neuroendocrinos Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias del Recto / Tumores Neuroendocrinos Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article