Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Risk of bladder, kidney and prostate cancer from occupational exposure to welding fumes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Collatuzzo, Giulia; Hamdani, Maha; Boffetta, Paolo.
Afiliación
  • Collatuzzo G; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti 9, 40138, Bologna, BO, Italy.
  • Hamdani M; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
  • Boffetta P; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti 9, 40138, Bologna, BO, Italy. paolo.boffetta@unibo.it.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health ; 97(3): 221-230, 2024 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38231405
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Our aimed to conduct a meta-analysis of cohort studies on risk of genitourinary (GU) cancers in workers exposed to welding fumes (WF).

METHODS:

We performed a systematic review of studies published on Pubmed, Scopus and Embase following PRISMA criteria. Two researchers selected cohort studies on WF exposure. From 2582 articles, 7 non-overlapping studies were included. Quality of studies was scored according to CASP. We run a random effects meta-analysis to calculate the relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of GU cancer, overall and stratified by cancer, country, and quality score.

RESULTS:

We included seven studies reporting results on GU cancers, including prostate, bladder and kidney cancer (PC, BC, and KC). The RR was 1.19 (95% CI = 1.07-1.32, 16 risk estimates) for GU cancer; 1.13 (95% CI = 0.90-1.42, 4 risk estimates) for PC; 1.26 (95% CI = 0.98-1.60, 7 risk estimates) for BC and 1.28 (95% CI = 1.12-1.47, 5 risk estimates) for KC. Heterogeneity was present in all meta-analyses (p < 0.001). The increased risk was more pronounced in North American than in European studies (respectively, OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.18-1.55; OR = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.01-1.27 p heterogeneity = 0.03). There was no heterogeneity according to quality score (p = 0.4). Data were insufficient to investigate associations by industry or welding type. Publication bias for each cancer was excluded.

CONCLUSION:

This meta-analysis suggests increased risk of KC and BC, but not of PC, in workers exposed to WF. Confounding by other occupational and non-occupational risk factors could not be excluded. Data were not adequate to address the risk of specific exposure circumstances.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata / Soldadura / Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria / Exposición Profesional / Neoplasias Renales / Enfermedades Profesionales Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata / Soldadura / Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria / Exposición Profesional / Neoplasias Renales / Enfermedades Profesionales Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia