Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Surgical metastasectomy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the era of targeted and immune therapy: a narrative review.
Tayeh, Georges Abi; Alkassis, Marwan; De La Taille, Alexandre; Vordos, Dimitri; Champy, Cécile Maud; Pelegrin, Tiphaine; Ingels, Alexandre.
Afiliación
  • Tayeh GA; Department of Urology, Henri Mondor Hospital, University of Paris Est Créteil, Créteil, France. georges.abitayeh1@gmail.com.
  • Alkassis M; Department of Urology, Henri Mondor Hospital, University of Paris Est Créteil, Créteil, France.
  • De La Taille A; Department of Urology, Henri Mondor Hospital, University of Paris Est Créteil, Créteil, France.
  • Vordos D; INSERM Clinical Investigation Center 1430, Henri Mondor University Hospital, AP-HP, Créteil, France.
  • Champy CM; Department of Urology, Henri Mondor Hospital, University of Paris Est Créteil, Créteil, France.
  • Pelegrin T; Department of Urology, Henri Mondor Hospital, University of Paris Est Créteil, Créteil, France.
  • Ingels A; INSERM Clinical Investigation Center 1430, Henri Mondor University Hospital, AP-HP, Créteil, France.
World J Urol ; 42(1): 51, 2024 Jan 20.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38244094
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) still harbours a big propensity for future metastasis. Combinations of immune and targeted therapies are currently the cornerstone of management with a less clear role for surgical metastasectomy (SM).

METHODS:

We performed a narrative review of literature searching for the available evidence on the yield of surgical metastasectomy in the era of targeted and immune therapies. The review consisted of a PubMed search of relevant articles using the Mesh terms" renal cell carcinoma", "surgery¼, «resection", "metastasectomy", "molecular targeted therapies", "immune checkpoint inhibitors" alone or in combination.

RESULTS:

In this review, we exposed the place of surgical metastasectomy within a multimodal treatment algorithm for mRCC Also, we detailed the patient selection criteria that yielded the best results when SM was performed. Finally, we discussed the feasibility and advantages of SM per organ site.

CONCLUSION:

Our work was able to show that SM could be proposed as a consolidation treatment to excise residual lesions that were deemed unresectable prior to a combination of systemic therapies. Contrastingly, it can be proposed as an upfront treatment, leaving systemic therapies as an alternative in case of future relapse. However, patient selection regarding their performance status, metastatic sites, number of lesions and tumorous characteristics is of paramount importance.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Carcinoma de Células Renales / Metastasectomía / Neoplasias Renales Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: World J Urol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Carcinoma de Células Renales / Metastasectomía / Neoplasias Renales Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: World J Urol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia