Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Costs of revision operations for distal junctional kyphosis following thoracic posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Theologis, Alekos A; Wu, Hao-Hua; Oeding, Jacob F; Diab, Mohammad.
Afiliación
  • Theologis AA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California - San Francisco (UCSF), Floor 05, Room 5430, Box 3212, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
  • Wu HH; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California - San Francisco (UCSF), Floor 05, Room 5430, Box 3212, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
  • Oeding JF; School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
  • Diab M; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California - San Francisco (UCSF), Floor 05, Room 5430, Box 3212, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA. mohammad.diab@ucsf.edu.
Eur Spine J ; 33(6): 2504-2511, 2024 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38376560
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To assess direct costs and risks associated with revision operations for distal junctional kyphosis/failure (DJK) following thoracic posterior spinal instrumented fusions (TPSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

METHODS:

Children who underwent TPSF for AIS by a single surgeon (2014-2020) were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were minimum follow-up of 2 years, thoracolumbar posterior instrumented fusion with a lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) cranial to L2. Patients who developed DJK requiring revision operations were identified and compared with those who did not develop DJK.

RESULTS:

Seventy-nine children were included for analysis. Of these, 6.3% developed DJK. Average time to revision was 20.8 ± 16.2 months. Comparing index operations, children who developed DJK had significantly greater BMIs, significantly lower thoracic kyphosis postoperatively, greater post-operative lumbar Cobb angles, and significantly more LIVs cranial to the sagittal stable vertebrae (SSV), despite having statistically similar pre-operative coronal and sagittal alignment parameters and operative details compared with non-DJK patients. Revision operations for DJK, when compared with index operations, involved significantly fewer levels, longer operative times, greater blood loss, and longer hospital lengths of stay. These factors resulted in significantly greater direct costs for revision operations for DJK ($76,883 v. $46,595; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS:

In this single-center experience, risk factors for development of DJK were greater BMI, lower post-operative thoracic kyphosis, and LIV cranial to SSV. As revision operations for DJK were significantly more costly than index operations, all efforts should be aimed at strategies to prevent DJK in the AIS population.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Reoperación / Escoliosis / Fusión Vertebral / Vértebras Torácicas / Cifosis Límite: Adolescent / Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Eur Spine J Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Reoperación / Escoliosis / Fusión Vertebral / Vértebras Torácicas / Cifosis Límite: Adolescent / Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Eur Spine J Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos