Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Endorsements of five reporting guidelines for biomedical research by journals of prominent publishers.
Wang, Peiling; Wolfram, Dietmar; Gilbert, Emrie.
Afiliación
  • Wang P; School of Information Sciences, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America.
  • Wolfram D; School of Information Studies, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States of America.
  • Gilbert E; School of Information Sciences, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America.
PLoS One ; 19(2): e0299806, 2024.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38421981
ABSTRACT
Biomedical research reporting guidelines provide a framework by which journal editors and the researchers who conduct studies can ensure that the reported research is both complete and transparent. With more than 16 different guidelines for the 11 major study types of medical and health research, authors need to be familiar with journal reporting standards. To assess the current endorsements of reporting guidelines for biomedical and health research, this study examined the instructions for authors (IFAs) of 559 biomedical journals by 11 prominent publishers that publish original research or systematic reviews/meta-analyses. Data from the above original sources were cleaned and restructured, and analyzed in a database and text miner. Each journal's instructions or information for authors were examined to code if any of five prominent reporting guidelines were mentioned and what form the guideline adherence demonstration took. Seventeen journals published the reporting guidelines. Four of the five reporting guidelines listed journals as endorsers. For journals with open peer review reports, a sample of journals and peer reviews was analyzed for mention of adherence to reporting guidelines. The endorsement of research guidelines by publishers and their associated journals is inconsistent for some publishers, with only a small number of journals endorsing relevant guidelines. Based on the analysis of open peer reviews, there is evidence that some reviewers check the adherence to the endorsed reporting guidelines. Currently, there is no universal endorsement of reporting guidelines by publishers nor ways of demonstrating adherence to guidelines. Journals may not directly inform authors of their guideline endorsements, making it more difficult for authors to adhere to endorsed guidelines. Suggestions derived from the findings are provided for authors, journals, and reporting guidelines to ensure increased adequate use of endorsed reporting guidelines.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Guías como Asunto / Investigación Biomédica Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Guías como Asunto / Investigación Biomédica Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos