Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Contralateral knee osteoarthritis is a risk factor for ipsilateral knee osteoarthritis progressing: a case control study.
Dai, Zhengxu; Yang, Tao; Liu, Jun.
Afiliación
  • Dai Z; Department of Orthopedics, Tianjin Hospital, No. 406 Jiefang South Rd, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211, China.
  • Yang T; Department of Orthopedics, Tianjin Hospital, No. 406 Jiefang South Rd, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211, China.
  • Liu J; Department of Joints, Tianjin Hospital, No. 406 Jiefang South Rd, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211, China. drliujun1968@126.com.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 25(1): 190, 2024 Mar 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38431551
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a highly disabling disease, and studying its progression is crucial. However, it is still unclear whether the progression of ipsilateral knee osteoarthritis is influenced by contralateral knee osteoarthritis.

METHODS:

Data were collected from the OAI database and divided into two study cohorts (right/left KOA cohort). Each cohort had a target knee (right/left knee) and was further divided into two groups (exposure/control group). The demographic data of both cohorts were balanced at baseline by propensity score matching (PSM), and the data included rating scale and radiographic and clinical data. After checking for balance in the matched variables, we then compared the differences between the two groups in each cohort. Our primary focus was on the minimum joint space width (mJSW) of the target knee, which was measured four years after baseline. The secondary outcome was the arthroplasty rate of the target knee within nine years.

RESULTS:

In this study, a total of 678 participants were enrolled and matched. After 11 PSM of the baseline demographic data, 98 participants in the right KOA cohort (RKOAC) were successfully matched, and 117 participants in the left KOA cohort (LKOAC) were successfully matched. Furthermore, the standardized mean difference (SMD) of the matched variables in both cohorts was less than 0.25. After analyzing the outcome metrics, we found that the target knee had a significantly lower mJSW in the fourth year after baseline and a significantly greater arthroplasty rate within nine years in the exposed group than in the control group. RKOAC mJSW (exposure 2.6(1.1 ~ 3.6) vs. control 3.3(2.0 ~ 4.2), P < 0.05), arthroplasty rate (exposure 14(14.3%) vs. control 4(4.1%), P < 0.05); LKOAC mJSW (exposure 3.1(2 ~ 3.9) vs. control 3.4(2.6 ~ 4.2), P < 0.05), arthroplasty rate (exposure 16(13.7%) vs. control 7(6%), P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients with knee osteoarthritis experienced greater progression of osteoarthritis when the contralateral knee was also affected.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla / Osteoartritis de la Rodilla Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Asunto de la revista: FISIOLOGIA / ORTOPEDIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla / Osteoartritis de la Rodilla Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Asunto de la revista: FISIOLOGIA / ORTOPEDIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China