Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Predictors of survival of large non-occlusal non-incisal glass-ionomer restorations in older adults.
Shi, Nailin; Peter, Tabitha; Caplan, Daniel J; Xie, Xian Jin; Dang, Connor A; Welhaven, Anne; Pendleton, Chandler; Allareddy, Veeratrishul; Kolker, Justine L; Marchini, Leonardo.
Afiliación
  • Shi N; University of Iowa College of Dentistry, Department of Preventive & Community Dentistry, Iowa City, USA.
  • Peter T; University of Iowa College of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Iowa City, USA.
  • Caplan DJ; University of Iowa College of Dentistry, Iowa Division of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Iowa City, USA.
  • Xie XJ; University of Iowa College of Dentistry, Department of Preventive & Community Dentistry, Iowa City, USA.
  • Dang CA; University of Iowa College of Dentistry, Department of Preventive & Community Dentistry, Iowa City, USA.
  • Welhaven A; University of Iowa College of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Iowa City, USA.
  • Pendleton C; University of Iowa College of Dentistry, Iowa Division of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Iowa City, USA.
  • Allareddy V; University of Iowa College of Dentistry, Iowa Institute for Oral Health Research, Iowa City, USA.
  • Kolker JL; University of Iowa College of Dentistry and Dental Clinics, Iowa City, USA.
  • Marchini L; University of Iowa College of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Iowa City, USA.
Spec Care Dentist ; 2024 Mar 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38449290
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

This study aimed to investigate the predictors of survival of non-occlusal non-incisal glass-ionomer restorations as a surrogate for root surface restorations among older adults.

METHODS:

In a retrospective cohort analysis using the University of Iowa College of Dentistry electronic dental records, we included 721 patients aged 65+ who received 2+ surface non-occlusal non-incisal glass ionomer restorations placed from January 2005 - December 2011. Restorations were followed until September 2017 or until they were deemed to have failed.

RESULTS:

At baseline, participants' mean age was 77.6 ± 8.2 years, and 45.8% were females. Most patients were self-pay (65.2%). Most restorations were placed by residents and dental students (82.7%) and included only two surfaces (95.6%). About half (49.1%) failed during follow-up, with a median survival time of 3.7 years. The time ratio for lower incisors compared to other teeth was 0.6 (p = .006), for three-and-four-surface restorations compared to two was 0.7 (p = .007), for faculty as providers compared to residents and students was 1.4 (p = .039), and for the Geriatric & Special Needs Clinic compared to others was 0.8 (p = .013). Time ratios less than one indicate association with shorter durations for restorations, and time ratios greater than one indicate association with longer durations for restorations.

CONCLUSION:

Tooth type, number of restored surfaces, provider type, and clinic were all significant factors associated with survival of these restorations.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Spec Care Dentist Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Spec Care Dentist Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos