Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effects of hyperbaric oxygen combined cabin ventilator on critically ill patients with liberation difficulty after tracheostomy.
Qi, Yinliang; Xu, Jixiang; Liu, Hui; Zhou, Xiaomei.
Afiliación
  • Qi Y; General Department of Hyperbaric Oxygen, the Second People's Hospital of Hefei, Hefei Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230011, Anhui, China.
  • Xu J; General Department of Hyperbaric Oxygen, the Second People's Hospital of Hefei, Hefei Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230011, Anhui, China.
  • Liu H; General Department of Hyperbaric Oxygen, the Second People's Hospital of Hefei, Hefei Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230011, Anhui, China.
  • Zhou X; General Department of Hyperbaric Oxygen, the Second People's Hospital of Hefei, Hefei Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230011, Anhui, China. xiaomeizhou13@gmail.com.
Biomed Eng Online ; 23(1): 30, 2024 Mar 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38454458
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Critically ill patients undergoing liberation often encounter various physiological and clinical complexities and challenges. However, whether the combination of hyperbaric oxygen and in-cabin ventilator therapy could offer a comprehensive approach that may simultaneously address respiratory and potentially improve outcomes in this challenging patient population remain unclear.

METHODS:

This retrospective study involved 148 patients experiencing difficulty in liberation after tracheotomy. Inclusion criteria comprised ongoing mechanical ventilation need, lung inflammation on computed tomography (CT) scans, and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores of ≤ 9. Exclusion criteria excluded patients with active bleeding, untreated pneumothorax, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, and a heart rate below 50 beats per minute. Following exclusions, 111 cases were treated with hyperbaric oxygen combined cabin ventilator, of which 72 cases were successfully liberated (SL group) and 28 cases (NSL group) were not successfully liberated. The hyperbaric oxygen chamber group received pressurization to 0.20 MPa (2.0 ATA) for 20 min, followed by 60 min of ventilator oxygen inhalation. Successful liberation was determined by a strict process, including subjective and objective criteria, with a prolonged spontaneous breathing trial. GCS assessments were conducted to evaluate consciousness levels, with scores categorized as normal, mildly impaired, moderately impaired, or severely impaired.

RESULTS:

Patients who underwent treatment exhibited improved GCS, blood gas indicators, and cardiac function indexes. The improvement of GCS, partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), oxygen saturation of blood (SaO2), oxygenation index (OI) in the SL group was significantly higher than that of the NSL group. However, there was no significant difference in the improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), and stroke volume (SV) between the SL group and the NSL group after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS:

Hyperbaric oxygen combined with in-cabin ventilator therapy effectively enhances respiratory function, cardiopulmonary function, and various indicators of critically ill patients with liberation difficulty after tracheostomy.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Traqueostomía / Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Biomed Eng Online Asunto de la revista: ENGENHARIA BIOMEDICA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Traqueostomía / Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Biomed Eng Online Asunto de la revista: ENGENHARIA BIOMEDICA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China