Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient Perception of Social Media Use by Orthopaedic Surgeons: A Pilot Study.
Johnson, Alexander J; Wharton, Benjamin R; Geraghty, Elisabeth H; Bradsell, Hannah; Ishikawa, Andrew; McCarty, Eric C; Bravman, Jonathan T; Frank, Rachel M.
Afiliación
  • Johnson AJ; Saint Luke's University Health Network, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Wharton BR; University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
  • Geraghty EH; University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
  • Bradsell H; University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
  • Ishikawa A; University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
  • McCarty EC; University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
  • Bravman JT; University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
  • Frank RM; University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Orthop J Sports Med ; 12(3): 23259671241232707, 2024 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38465258
ABSTRACT

Background:

Social media (SM) use by orthopaedic surgeons is becoming increasingly common; nonetheless, it needs to be clarified how patients perceive the content posted by physicians.

Purpose:

To characterize SM content posted by orthopaedic surgeons while investigating patient perceptions of this content and how it may influence their health care decisions. Study

Design:

Cross-sectional study.

Methods:

Posts on SM outlets by orthopaedic surgeons were reviewed and categorized. A survey to assess patient perception of these categories was administered between December 2021 and February 2022 in the clinics of 3 orthopaedic surgeons. Survey results were analyzed for differences in patient SM use and perception of SM content types.

Results:

There were 250 completed surveys. SM use was high among all age groups; however, the 18 to 24 years (87.1%) and 25 to 34 years (86.4%) age groups were more likely than older age groups to report daily use (P = .002). Overall, 17% of patients reported using SM to see information about their health care at least once per month, 21% reported reviewing the SM account of a physician at least once per month, 19% reported that they were likely or very likely to view the SM account of their physician, and 23% reported that SM content was likely or very likely to influence which physician they see. Patients held the most consistently positive view of posts that educated patients, discussed sports team coverage, and provided patient testimonials. Patients had consistently neutral views of posts educating colleagues, discussing presentations at national meetings, displaying aspects of surgeons' personal lives, and supporting marginalized groups. Several post categories elicited highly polarized responses-including those discussing research publications and showing surgical techniques or pictures/videos taken during surgery. Respondents had a consistently negative response to posts making political statements.

Conclusion:

SM is likely a useful tool to help physicians interact with patients. Physicians who wish to interact with patients should consider posting content viewed most positively-including posts educating patients, discussing sports team coverage, and providing patient testimonials. Content that is viewed less favorably should be posted sparingly or with a sensitive tag.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Orthop J Sports Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Orthop J Sports Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos