Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Radiotherapy in localized prostate cancer: a multicenter analysis evaluating tumor control and late toxicity after brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy in 1293 patients.
Moll, Matthias; Nechvile, Elisabeth; Kirisits, Christian; Komina, Oxana; Pajer, Thomas; Kohl, Bettina; Miszczyk, Marcin; Widder, Joachim; Knocke-Abulesz, Tomas-Hendrik; Goldner, Gregor.
Afiliación
  • Moll M; Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. Matthias.moll@meduniwien.ac.at.
  • Nechvile E; Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. Matthias.moll@meduniwien.ac.at.
  • Kirisits C; Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinik Hietzing, Vienna, Austria.
  • Komina O; Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Pajer T; Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinik Hietzing, Vienna, Austria.
  • Kohl B; Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinik Hietzing, Vienna, Austria.
  • Miszczyk M; Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinik Hietzing, Vienna, Austria.
  • Widder J; Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Knocke-Abulesz TH; IIIrd, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Wybrzeze Armii Krajowej 15, 44-102, Gliwice, Poland.
  • Goldner G; Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 200(8): 698-705, 2024 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38488901
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

PURPOSE:

Comparing oncological outcomes and toxicity after primary treatment of localized prostate cancer using HDR- or LDR-mono-brachytherapy (BT), or conventionally (CF) or moderately hypofractionated (HF) external beam radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Retrospectively, patients with low- (LR) or favorable intermediate-risk (IR) prostate cancer treated between 03/2000 and 09/2022 in two centers were included. Treatment was performed using either CF with total doses between 74 and 78 Gy, HF with 2.4-2.6 Gy per fraction in 30 fractions, or LDR- or HDR-BT. Biochemical control (BC) according to the Phoenix criteria, and late gastrointestinal (GI), and genitourinary (GU) toxicity according to RTOG/EORTC criteria were assessed.

RESULTS:

We identified 1293 patients, 697 with LR and 596 with IR prostate cancer. Of these, 470, 182, 480, and 161 were treated with CF, HF, LDR-BT, and HDR-BT, respectively. For BC, we did not find a significant difference between treatments in LR and IR (p = 0.31 and 0.72). The 5­year BC for LR was between 93 and 95% for all treatment types. For IR, BC was between 88% in the CF and 94% in the HF group. For CF and HF, maximum GI and GU toxicity grade ≥ 2 was between 22 and 27%. For LDR-BT, we observed 67% grade ≥ 2 GU toxicity. Maximum GI grade ≥ 2 toxicity was 9%. For HDR-BT, we observed 1% GI grade ≥ 2 toxicity and 19% GU grade ≥ 2 toxicity.

CONCLUSION:

All types of therapy were effective and well received. HDR-BT caused the least late toxicities, especially GI.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata / Traumatismos por Radiación / Braquiterapia Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Strahlenther Onkol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS / RADIOTERAPIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Austria

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata / Traumatismos por Radiación / Braquiterapia Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Strahlenther Onkol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS / RADIOTERAPIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Austria