Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Structural neuroimaging markers of normal pressure hydrocephalus versus Alzheimer's dementia and Parkinson's disease, and hydrocephalus versus atrophy in chronic TBI-a narrative review.
Kadaba Sridhar, Sharada; Dysterheft Robb, Jen; Gupta, Rishabh; Cheong, Scarlett; Kuang, Rui; Samadani, Uzma.
Afiliación
  • Kadaba Sridhar S; Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
  • Dysterheft Robb J; Neurotrauma Research Lab, Center for Veterans Research and Education, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
  • Gupta R; Neurotrauma Research Lab, Center for Veterans Research and Education, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
  • Cheong S; Neurotrauma Research Lab, Center for Veterans Research and Education, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
  • Kuang R; University of Minnesota Twin Cities Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
  • Samadani U; Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Front Neurol ; 15: 1347200, 2024.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38576534
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (NPH) is a prominent type of reversible dementia that may be treated with shunt surgery, and it is crucial to differentiate it from irreversible degeneration caused by its symptomatic mimics like Alzheimer's Dementia (AD) and Parkinson's Disease (PD). Similarly, it is important to distinguish between (normal pressure) hydrocephalus and irreversible atrophy/degeneration which are among the chronic effects of Traumatic Brain Injury (cTBI), as the former may be reversed through shunt placement. The purpose of this review is to elucidate the structural imaging markers which may be foundational to the development of accurate, noninvasive, and accessible solutions to this problem.

Methods:

By searching the PubMed database for keywords related to NPH, AD, PD, and cTBI, we reviewed studies that examined the (1) distinct neuroanatomical markers of degeneration in NPH versus AD and PD, and atrophy versus hydrocephalus in cTBI and (2) computational methods for their (semi-) automatic assessment on Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans.

Results:

Structural markers of NPH and those that can distinguish it from AD have been well studied, but only a few studies have explored its structural distinction between PD. The structural implications of cTBI over time have been studied. But neuroanatomical markers that can predict shunt response in patients with either symptomatic idiopathic NPH or post-traumatic hydrocephalus have not been reliably established. MRI-based markers dominate this field of investigation as compared to CT, which is also reflected in the disproportionate number of MRI-based computational methods for their automatic assessment.

Conclusion:

Along with an up-to-date literature review on the structural neurodegeneration due to NPH versus AD/PD, and hydrocephalus versus atrophy in cTBI, this article sheds light on the potential of structural imaging markers as (differential) diagnostic aids for the timely recognition of patients with reversible (normal pressure) hydrocephalus, and opportunities to develop computational tools for their objective assessment.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Neurol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Neurol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos