Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Astringency and its sub-qualities: a review of astringency mechanisms and methods for measuring saliva lubrication.
Wang, Shaoyang; Smyth, Heather E; Olarte Mantilla, Sandra M; Stokes, Jason R; Smith, Paul A.
Afiliación
  • Wang S; Centre for Nutrition and Food Sciences, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Indooroopilly, QLD 4068, Australia.
  • Smyth HE; Centre for Nutrition and Food Sciences, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Indooroopilly, QLD 4068, Australia.
  • Olarte Mantilla SM; Centre for Nutrition and Food Sciences, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Indooroopilly, QLD 4068, Australia.
  • Stokes JR; School of Chemical Engineering, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
  • Smith PA; Wine Australia, P.O. Box 2733, Kent Town, SA 5071, Australia.
Chem Senses ; 492024 Jan 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38591722
ABSTRACT
Astringency is an important mouthfeel attribute that influences the sensory experiences of many food and beverage products. While salivary lubricity loss and increased oral friction were previously believed to be the only astringency mechanisms, recent research has demonstrated that nontactile oral receptors can trigger astringency by responding to astringents without mechanical stimulation. Various human factors have also been identified that affect individual responses to astringents. This article presents a critical review of the key research milestones contributing to the current understanding of astringency mechanisms and the instrumental approaches used to quantify perceived astringency intensity. Although various chemical assays or physical measures mimic in-mouth processes involved in astringent mouthfeel, this review highlights how one chemical or physical approach can only provide a single measure of astringency determined by a specific mechanism. Subsequently, using a single measurement to predict astringency perception is overly idealistic. Astringency has not been quantified beyond the loss of saliva lubrication; therefore, nontactile receptor-based responses must also be explored. An important question remains about whether astringency is a single perception or involves distinct sub-qualities such as pucker, drying, and roughness. Although these sub-quality lexicons have been frequently cited, most studies currently view astringency as a single perception rather than dividing it into sub-qualities and investigating the potentially independent mechanisms of each. Addressing these knowledge gaps should be an important priority for future research.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Saliva / Lubrificación Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Chem Senses Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Saliva / Lubrificación Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Chem Senses Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia