Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost-Effectiveness of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel for Adult Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma in the United States.
Oluwole, Olalekan O; Ray, Markqayne D; Rosettie, Katherine L; Ball, Graeme; Jacob, Jorge; Bilir, S Pinar; Patel, Anik R; Jacobson, Caron A.
Afiliación
  • Oluwole OO; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA. Electronic address: olalekan.oluwole@vumc.org.
  • Ray MD; Kite, A Gilead Company, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
  • Rosettie KL; IQVIA, Falls Church, VA, USA.
  • Ball G; Kite, A Gilead Company, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
  • Jacob J; IQVIA, London, England, UK.
  • Bilir SP; IQVIA, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Patel AR; Kite, A Gilead Company, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
  • Jacobson CA; Dana-Faber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Value Health ; 27(8): 1030-1038, 2024 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38641058
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The results of a recent single-arm trial (ZUMA-5) of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) for relapsed/refractory (r/r) follicular lymphoma (FL) demonstrated high rates of durable response and tolerable toxicity among treated patients. To quantify the value of axi-cel compared with standard of care (SOC) to manage r/r FL patients who have had at least 2 prior lines of systemic therapy (3L+), a cost-effectiveness model was developed from a US third-party payer perspective.

METHODS:

A 3-state partitioned-survival cost-effectiveness model was developed with a lifetime horizon. Patient-level analyses of the 36-month ZUMA-5 (axi-cel) and SCHOLAR-5 (SOC) studies were used to extrapolate progression-free and overall survivals. After 5 years of survival, an estimated 40% of the modeled population was assumed to experience long-term remission based on literature. Results include the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) measured as incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. One-way sensitivity analysis, probabilistic sensitivity analysis, and scenario analyses were performed. All outcomes were discounted 3% per year.

RESULTS:

Axi-cel led to an increase of 4.28 life-years, 3.64 QALYs, and a total cost increase of $321 192 relative to SOC, resulting in an ICER of $88 300 per QALY. Across all parameters varied in the one-way sensitivity analysis, the ICER varied between $133 030 and $67 277. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, axi-cel had a 99% probability of being cost-effective across 5000 iterations using a $150 000 willingness-to-pay threshold.

CONCLUSIONS:

Given the robustness of the model results and sensitivity analyses, axi-cel is expected to be a cost-effective treatment in 3L+ r/r FL.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Linfoma Folicular / Análisis Costo-Beneficio / Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Value Health Asunto de la revista: FARMACOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Linfoma Folicular / Análisis Costo-Beneficio / Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Value Health Asunto de la revista: FARMACOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article