Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Applicant and Program Director Perceptions of Second Look Events During the 2023 Radiation Oncology Residency Match.
Mahoney, Mary T; Corrigan, Kelsey L; Linkowski, Lauren C; Abdelaal, Moamen R; Munsell, Mark F; Cruz, Denise De La; Royal, Angelika; Braunstein, Steve E; Mix, Michael D; Gunther, Jillian R.
Afiliación
  • Mahoney MT; Transitional Year Residency Program, Garnet Health, Middletown, New York.
  • Corrigan KL; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Linkowski LC; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Abdelaal MR; Transitional Year Program, Capital Health Medical Center, Pennington, New Jersey.
  • Munsell MF; Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Cruz D; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Royal A; Department of Radiation Oncology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York.
  • Braunstein SE; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
  • Mix MD; Department of Radiation Oncology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York.
  • Gunther JR; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Adv Radiat Oncol ; 9(6): 101473, 2024 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38681887
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

Virtual radiation oncology (RO) residency interviews may impair applicant and program evaluation. Second look events (SLEs) exist; however, the frequency, nature, and implications are unknown. We surveyed applicants and program directors (PDs) to characterize the 2023 RO Match SLEs and assess perspectives. Method and Materials An online, anonymous survey was distributed to 2023 RO Match applicants and American College of Graduate Medical Education-accredited RO PDs post-Match. Number and percentage are reported as response per question. Likert-type scores (1, strongly agree; 5, strongly disagree) are reported as median, IQR.

Results:

Responses were received from 51 of 246 applicants (21%) and 52 of 88 PDs (59%). Forty applicants (87%) were offered in-person and virtual SLEs; 20 (51%) and 17 (44%) applicants were invited to 1 to 3 and 4 to 6 events, respectively. Most invited applicants attended none (21, 54%). Applicants reported that all (21, 54%) or some (16, 41%) programs communicated intentions to finalize rank order lists (ROLs) before SLEs. Most applicants (29, 74%) agreed that SLEs were optional without ROL consequences (median, 2, IQR 1-3). Applicants declined in-person SLEs due to city/facility indifference (10, 43%), finances (10, 43%), and logistics (9, 39%). Most (12, 86%) in-person SLE attendees agreed that SLEs influenced their ROL (median, 2, IQR 1-2). Nineteen PDs (40%) reported offering SLEs, with 18 of 19 being in-person. PDs who did not offer SLEs cited ethical concerns (13, 45%) and institutional policies (11, 38%). All PDs reported that SLEs were optional, and 18 of 19 explained that the SLE would be without ROL consequences. SLEs mostly occurred in February before (11, 58%) and after (15, 79%) ROL submission.

Conclusions:

In-person SLEs occurred during Match 2023. All PDs considered SLEs optional which was trusted by most applicants. Attendance at in-person SLEs influenced applicants' ROLs; however, finances and logistics impaired applicant attendance. Further work is needed to appreciate SLE implications and ensure equitable residency recruitment.

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Adv Radiat Oncol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Adv Radiat Oncol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article