Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Periapical Lesions in Panoramic Radiography and CBCT Imaging-Assessment of AI's Diagnostic Accuracy.
Kazimierczak, Wojciech; Wajer, Róza; Wajer, Adrian; Kiian, Veronica; Kloska, Anna; Kazimierczak, Natalia; Janiszewska-Olszowska, Joanna; Serafin, Zbigniew.
Afiliación
  • Kazimierczak W; Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Jagiellonska 13-15, 85-067 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
  • Wajer R; Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University Hospital no 1 in Bydgoszcz, Marii Sklodowskiej Curie 9, 85-094 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
  • Wajer A; Kazimierczak Private Medical Practice, Dworcowa 13/u6a, 85-009 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
  • Kiian V; Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University Hospital no 1 in Bydgoszcz, Marii Sklodowskiej Curie 9, 85-094 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
  • Kloska A; Dental Primus, Poznanska 18, 88-100 Inowroclaw, Poland.
  • Kazimierczak N; Kazimierczak Private Medical Practice, Dworcowa 13/u6a, 85-009 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
  • Janiszewska-Olszowska J; The Faculty of Medicine, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Kaliskiego 7, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
  • Serafin Z; Kazimierczak Private Medical Practice, Dworcowa 13/u6a, 85-009 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
J Clin Med ; 13(9)2024 May 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38731237
ABSTRACT
Background/

Objectives:

Periapical lesions (PLs) are frequently detected in dental radiology. Accurate diagnosis of these lesions is essential for proper treatment planning. Imaging techniques such as orthopantomogram (OPG) and cone-beam CT (CBCT) imaging are used to identify PLs. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) software Diagnocat for PL detection in OPG and CBCT images.

Methods:

The study included 49 patients, totaling 1223 teeth. Both OPG and CBCT images were analyzed by AI software and by three experienced clinicians. All the images were obtained in one patient cohort, and findings were compared to the consensus of human readers using CBCT. The AI's diagnostic accuracy was compared to a reference method, calculating sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and F1 score.

Results:

The AI's sensitivity for OPG images was 33.33% with an F1 score of 32.73%. For CBCT images, the AI's sensitivity was 77.78% with an F1 score of 84.00%. The AI's specificity was over 98% for both OPG and CBCT images.

Conclusions:

The AI demonstrated high sensitivity and high specificity in detecting PLs in CBCT images but lower sensitivity in OPG images.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Polonia

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Polonia