Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The impact of bone marrow stimulation on arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for small to large rotator cuff tears: a randomized controlled trial.
Hong, Keun-Bae; Lee, Tae-Ho; Park, Hong-Keun; Lee, Jae-Hyung; Chung, Seok-Won; Park, Jin-Young.
Afiliación
  • Hong KB; Center for Shoulder, Elbow and Sports, Neon Orthopaedic Clinic, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee TH; Chawon Orthopedic Clinic, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
  • Park HK; Center for Shoulder, Elbow and Sports, Neon Orthopaedic Clinic, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee JH; Cheondam Reon Orthopaedic Clinic, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Chung SW; Glocal Center for Shoulder & Elbow, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Konkuk University Hospital, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Park JY; Center for Shoulder, Elbow and Sports, Neon Orthopaedic Clinic, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: drpark@naver.com.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38750786
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Bone marrow stimulation (BMS), a procedure involving the creation of multiple channels in the greater tuberosity, is often performed alongside arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). This study evaluated the effect of BMS on clinical and structural outcomes following ARCR.

METHOD:

This study involved 204 patients with small, medium, and large full-thickness rotator cuff tears. In all, 103 patients who underwent BMS and ARCR made up the BMS group, while the 101 patients who only had ARCR made up the control group with randomization. Clinical and functional outcomes were assessed before and at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery, using parameters such as range of motion, functional scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Constant score), and clinical scores (Visual Analogue Scale). Tendon integrity was also examined postoperatively via ultrasound at 6 months and 2 years.

RESULTS:

There were no significant differences between the two groups concerning range of motion, functional scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and Constant score), and clinical score (Visual Analogue Scale) during the 2-year postsurgery period (all P > .05). Similarly, the rotator cuff retear rate, as assessed using ultrasonographic tendon integrity checks over 2 years postsurgery, did not significantly vary between the groups (all P > .05).

CONCLUSION:

There were no significant disparities in functional scores and clinical outcomes between the BMS and control groups. Further, no significant differences were observed in tendon integrity postsurgery. Therefore, the inclusion or exclusion of BMS is not anticipated to influence the postoperative outcome in ARCR for patients with small, medium, or large rotator cuff tears.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article