Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Therapy-Related Satisfaction and Quality of Life for Japanese People with Diabetes Using Rapid-Acting Insulin Analogs: A Web-Based Survey.
Ishii, Hitoshi; Maeda, Yasutaka; Sato, Manaka; Cai, Zhihong; Imori, Makoto.
Afiliación
  • Ishii H; Department of Doctor-Patient Relationships, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.
  • Maeda Y; Patient Author; Clinic Masae Minami, Fukuoka, Japan.
  • Sato M; Japan Drug Development & Medical Affairs, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Lilly Plaza One Bldg., 5-1-28, Isogamidori, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 651-0086, Japan. sato_manaka@lilly.com.
  • Cai Z; Japan Drug Development & Medical Affairs, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Lilly Plaza One Bldg., 5-1-28, Isogamidori, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 651-0086, Japan.
  • Imori M; Japan Drug Development & Medical Affairs, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Lilly Plaza One Bldg., 5-1-28, Isogamidori, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 651-0086, Japan.
Diabetes Ther ; 15(7): 1577-1595, 2024 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38760595
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

People with diabetes require insulin to regulate blood glucose (BG); rapid-acting insulin analogs (RAIA) represent one approach for BG management. New fast-acting RAIA administered at the start of a meal suppress postprandial BG better than conventional RAIA. New RAIA are expected to confer higher treatment satisfaction and improved quality of life (QOL) than conventional RAIA.

METHODS:

This cross-sectional, web-based survey in Japan (November 2022) included people with diabetes (type 1/2), aged ≥ 18 years, registered in the Rakuten Insight Diabetes Panel, using new and/or conventional RAIA. RAIA-specific satisfaction was evaluated by questions on RAIA use (scores 1 [not at all satisfied]; 7 [very satisfied]) and QOL by the Diabetes Therapy-Related (DTR)-QOL questionnaire (scores 0-100, 100 = best) for the whole population (primary endpoint) and for new versus conventional RAIA users (secondary endpoint). Multiple regression models were used to compare new versus conventional RAIA users.

RESULTS:

The analysis population comprised 217 people with diabetes (new RAIA, n = 109; conventional RAIA, n = 108). Mean (standard deviation) RAIA-specific satisfaction scores ranged from 5.1 (1.2) to 5.4 (1.2); DTR-QOL total score was 51.6 (20.4). RAIA satisfaction scores were numerically higher for new versus conventional RAIA users; no difference in DTR-QOL total score was observed. DTR-QOL satisfaction with treatment domain score was significantly higher in new versus conventional RAIA users (least squares mean difference [standard error] 7.3 [3.1]; 95% confidence interval 1.2, 13.4; P = 0.0197). RAIA-specific satisfaction was higher among patients who discussed BG sufficiently with their doctor versus those who did not.

CONCLUSIONS:

New RAIA users have greater treatment satisfaction than conventional RAIA users. QOL was similar among new and conventional RAIA users, except for satisfaction with treatment, which was significantly higher among new RAIA users. Detailed explanations from the doctor to the person with diabetes about the relationship between new RAIA and BG status are essential. A graphical plain language summary is available with this article.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Diabetes Ther Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Diabetes Ther Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón