Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Research on Gas Multi-indicator Warning Method of Coal Mine Working Face Based on MOA-Transformer.
Yang, Huan; Wang, Jian; Zhang, Haoliang.
Afiliación
  • Yang H; Changzhou Research Institute Co., Ltd., China Coal Technology and Engineering Group, Changzhou 213000, China.
  • Wang J; Tiandi (Changzhou) Automation Co., Ltd., China Coal Technology and Engineering Group, Changzhou 213000, China.
  • Zhang H; Changzhou Research Institute Co., Ltd., China Coal Technology and Engineering Group, Changzhou 213000, China.
ACS Omega ; 9(20): 22136-22144, 2024 May 21.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38799340
ABSTRACT
The gas emission from the coal mine working face is influenced by multiple factors, resulting in the real-time value, fluctuation, and trend changes of gas concentration being relatively independent and interrelated. This paper establishes a gas multi-indicator warning method that can comprehensively warn the status of real-time value, fluctuation, and trend changes of gas concentration from the working face. This paper proposes six basic indicators and includes two main research contents intelligent threshold partition and gas multi-indicator warning. First, this paper proposes an intelligent threshold partition algorithm based on GF-KMeans (genetic fixed-centered K-means), which combines a genetic algorithm (GA) and an FC-KMeans (fixed-centered K-means) algorithm to dynamically partition the threshold range corresponding to the gas warning level. The GA solves the local optimal problem in the traditional K-Means algorithm, enhancing its stability and predictability. The FC-KMeans algorithm achieves a more precise control in the initial clustering center selection. Second, this paper researches a gas multi-indicator warning method based on a multihead optimal attention (MOA)-Transformer. By using the multihead optimization attention mechanism to represent classification features and utilizing Transformer's encoder structure to classify gas warning. The experimental result shows that the accuracy of the MOA-Transformer method is 86.17%, which is 3.45% higher than that of the Transformer method. The precision of the MOA-Transformer method is 88.78%, which is 3.75% higher than that of the Transformer method. The recall of the MOA-Transformer method is 85.23%, which is 4.70% higher than that of the Transformer method. The macro-F1 of the MOA-Transformer method is 86.96%, which is 4.39% higher than that of the Transformer method. The results fully demonstrate the superiority of the MOA-Transformer method in gas warning tasks.

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: ACS Omega Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: ACS Omega Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China