Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of cavity shave margins in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ undergoing conserving breast surgery.
Vanni, Gianluca; Pellicciaro, Marco; Materazzo, Marco; Marsella, Valentina; Usai, Valeria; Noce, Annalisa; Buonomo, Oreste Claudio.
Afiliación
  • Vanni G; Breast Unit Policlinico Tor Vergata, Department of Surgical Science, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy.
  • Pellicciaro M; Breast Unit Policlinico Tor Vergata, Department of Surgical Science, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy.
  • Materazzo M; PhD Program in Applied Medical-Surgical Sciences, Department of Surgical Science, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy.
  • Marsella V; Breast Unit Policlinico Tor Vergata, Department of Surgical Science, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy.
  • Usai V; PhD Program in Applied Medical-Surgical Sciences, Department of Surgical Science, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy.
  • Noce A; Breast Unit Policlinico Tor Vergata, Department of Surgical Science, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy.
  • Buonomo OC; PhD Program in Applied Medical-Surgical Sciences, Department of Surgical Science, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy.
Front Oncol ; 14: 1403069, 2024.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38817901
ABSTRACT

Aim:

The main challenge during breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is to obtain clear margins, especially in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) due to the absence of well-defined nodules. Many surgical approaches have been used in an attempt to reduce the positive margin rate. The aim of this retrospective study is to compare the cavity shave margin technique with standard surgery and the intraoperative evaluation of surgical margins.

Methods:

This is a single-center retrospective study analyzing margin status, need for re-excision, and surgical time in a cohort of 227 patients who underwent surgery from September 2016 to September 2022.

Results:

In patients subjected to cavity shaving, we reported a significant reduction in positive margins of 17.1% versus 28.7% (p-value = 0.042). Also, a difference in terms of surgical re-excision was reported as p-value = 0.039 (12.4% versus 23.8%, respectively, for the cavity shave and control group). In the multivariate analysis, intraoperative evaluation of the margins was a risk factor for margins re-excision (Wald = 4.315, p = 0.038, OR 2.331 [95% CI 1.049-5.180]). Surgical time was lower in patients subjected to cavity shaves (p = 0.024), and the relative mean time was 68.4 min ± 37.1 min in the cavity shave group versus 93.9 min ± 40.6 min in the control group.

Conclusion:

The cavity shave margin technique in conserving breast surgery results in a reduction in positive margin rate, surgical re-excision, and operative time.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Oncol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Oncol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia