Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The unexpected influence of legacy conspecific density dependence.
Magee, Lukas J; LaManna, Joseph A; Wolf, Amy T; Howe, Robert W; Lu, Yuanming; Valle, Denis; Smith, Daniel J B; Bagchi, Robert; Bauman, David; Johnson, Daniel J.
Afiliación
  • Magee LJ; School of Forest, Fisheries, and Geomatics Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
  • LaManna JA; Department of Biological Sciences, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
  • Wolf AT; Department of Biology and Natural and Applied Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Green Bay, Green Bay, Wisconsin, USA.
  • Howe RW; Department of Biology and Natural and Applied Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Green Bay, Green Bay, Wisconsin, USA.
  • Lu Y; Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
  • Valle D; School of Forest, Fisheries, and Geomatics Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
  • Smith DJB; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
  • Bagchi R; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA.
  • Bauman D; AMAP, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, CNRS, IRAE, IRD, Montpellier, France.
  • Johnson DJ; School of Forest, Fisheries, and Geomatics Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Ecol Lett ; 27(6): e14449, 2024 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38857318
ABSTRACT
When plants die, neighbours escape competition. Living conspecifics could disproportionately benefit because they are freed from negative intraspecific processes; however, if the negative effects of past conspecific neighbours persist, other species might be advantaged, and diversity might be maintained through legacy effects. We examined legacy effects in a mapped forest by modelling the survival of 37,212 trees of 23 species using four neighbourhood properties living conspecific, living heterospecific, legacy conspecific (dead conspecifics) and legacy heterospecific densities. Legacy conspecific effects proved nearly four times stronger than living conspecific effects; changes in annual survival associated with legacy conspecific density were 1.5% greater than living conspecific effects. Over 90% of species were negatively impacted by legacy conspecific density, compared to 47% by living conspecific density. Our results emphasize that legacies of trees alter community dynamics, revealing that prior research may have underestimated the strength of density dependent interactions by not considering legacy effects.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Árboles / Bosques / Densidad de Población Idioma: En Revista: Ecol Lett Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Árboles / Bosques / Densidad de Población Idioma: En Revista: Ecol Lett Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos