Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Pulsed Field Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation of Idiopathic LV Arrhythmias.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Comparative efficacy and safety data on radiofrequency ablation (RFA) versus pulsed field ablation (PFA) for common idiopathic left ventricular arrhythmia (LV-VAs) locations are lacking. OBJECTIVES: This study sough to compare RFA with PFA of common idiopathic LV-VAs locations. METHODS: Ten swine were randomized to PFA or RFA of LV interventricular septum, papillary muscle, LV summit via distal coronary sinus, and LV epicardium via subxiphoid approach. Ablations were delivered using an investigational dual-energy (RFA/PFA) contact force (CF) and local impedance-sensing catheter. After 1-week survival, animals were euthanized for lesion assessment. RESULTS: A total of 55 PFA (4 applications/site of 2.0 KV, target CF ≥10 g) and 36 RFA (CF ≥10 g, 25-50 W targeting ≥50 Ω local impedance drop, 60-second duration) were performed. LV interventricular septum average PFA depth 7.8 mm vs RFA 7.9 mm (P = 0.78) and no adverse events. Papillary muscle average PFA depth 8.1 mm vs RFA 4.5 mm (P < 0.01). Left ventricular summit average PFA depth 5.6 mm vs RFA 2.7 mm (P < 0.01). Steam-pop and/or ventricular fibrillation in 4 of 12 RFA vs 0 of 12 PFA (P < 0.01), no ST-segment changes observed. Epicardium average PFA depth 6.4 mm vs RFA 3.3 mm (P < 0.01). Transient ST-segment elevations/depressions occurred in 4 of 5 swine in the PFA arm vs 0 of 5 in the RFA arm (P < 0.01). Angiography acutely and at 7 days showed normal coronaries in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: In this swine study, compared with RFA, PFA of common idiopathic LV-VAs locations produced deeper lesions with fewer steam pops. However, PFA was associated with higher rates of transient ST-segment elevations and depressions with direct epicardium ablation.