Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Psychological and psychosocial interventions for treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Salahuddin, Nurul Husna; Schütz, Alexandra; Pitschel-Walz, Gabi; Mayer, Susanna Franziska; Chaimani, Anna; Siafis, Spyridon; Priller, Josef; Leucht, Stefan; Bighelli, Irene.
Afiliación
  • Salahuddin NH; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Schütz A; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Pitschel-Walz G; Institute of General Practice and Health Services Research, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Mayer SF; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Chaimani A; Université Paris Cité, Centre of Research in Epidemiology and Statistics (CRESS-U1153), Inserm, Paris, France.
  • Siafis S; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; German Centre for Mental Health (DZPG), Munich and Augsburg, Germany.
  • Priller J; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; German Centre for Mental Health (DZPG), Munich and Augsburg, Germany; Neuropsychiatry and Laboratory of Molecular Psychiatry, Charité-Universitäts
  • Leucht S; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; German Centre for Mental Health (DZPG), Munich and Augsburg, Germany. Electronic address: stefan.leucht@tum.de.
  • Bighelli I; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; German Centre for Mental Health (DZPG), Munich and Augsburg, Germany.
Lancet Psychiatry ; 11(7): 545-553, 2024 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38879276
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Many patients with schizophrenia have symptoms that do not respond to antipsychotics. This condition is called treatment-resistant schizophrenia and has not received specific attention as opposed to general schizophrenia. Psychological and psychosocial interventions as an add-on treatment to pharmacotherapy could be useful, but their role and comparative efficacy to each other and to standard care in this population are not known. We investigated the efficacy, acceptability, and tolerability of psychological and psychosocial interventions for patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia.

METHODS:

In this systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA), we searched for published and unpublished randomised controlled trials (RCTs) through a systematic database search in BIOSIS, CINAHL, Embase, LILACS, MEDLINE, PsychInfo, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for articles published from inception up to Jan 31, 2020. We also searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group registry for studies published from inception up to March 31, 2022, and PubMed and Cochrane CENTRAL for studies published from inception up to July 31, 2023. We included RCTs that included patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. The primary outcome was overall symptoms. We did random-effects pairwise meta-analyses and NMAs to calculate standardised mean differences (SMDs) or risk ratios with 95% CIs. No people with lived experience were involved throughout the research process. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO, CRD42022358696.

FINDINGS:

We identified 30 326 records, excluding 24 526 by title and abstract screening. 5762 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, of which 5540 were excluded for not meeting the eligibility criteria, and 222 reports corresponding to 60 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Of these, 52 RCTs with 5034 participants (1654 [33·2%] females and 3325 [66·8%] males with sex indicated) comparing 20 psychological and psychosocial interventions provided data for the NMA. Mean age of participants was 38·05 years (range 23·10-48·50). We aimed to collect ethnicity data, but they were scarcely reported. According to the quality of evidence, cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis (CBTp; SMD -0·22, 95% CI -0·35 to -0·09, 35 trials), virtual reality intervention (SMD -0·41, -0·79 to -0·02, four trials), integrated intervention (SMD -0·70, -1·18 to -0·22, three trials), and music therapy (SMD -1·27, -1·83 to -0·70, one study) were more efficacious than standard care in reducing overall symptoms. No indication of publication bias was identified.

INTERPRETATION:

We provide robust findings that CBTp can reduce the overall symptoms of patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia, and therefore clinicians can prioritise this intervention in their clinical practice. Other psychological and psychosocial interventions showed promising results but need further investigation.

FUNDING:

DAAD-ASFE.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Metaanálisis en Red / Intervención Psicosocial / Esquizofrenia Resistente al Tratamiento Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Lancet Psychiatry Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Metaanálisis en Red / Intervención Psicosocial / Esquizofrenia Resistente al Tratamiento Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Lancet Psychiatry Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania