Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Low-Dose Enteric-Coated and Chewable Aspirin Are Not Equally Effective in Preventing Venous Thromboembolism in Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty.
D'Amore, Taylor; Cozzarelli, Nicholas F; Sutton, Ryan; Lonner, Jess H; Fillingham, Yale A.
Afiliación
  • D'Amore T; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Cozzarelli NF; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Sutton R; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Lonner JH; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Fillingham YA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
J Arthroplasty ; 2024 Jun 16.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38889809
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Low-dose aspirin is an effective venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylactic medication in primary total joint arthroplasty, but the efficacy and safety of the formulations of chewable and enteric-coated aspirin have not been compared. The purpose of this study was to investigate the VTE and gastrointestinal (GI) complication rates of chewable and enteric-coated 81 mg aspirin bis in die for VTE prophylaxis in primary total joint arthroplasty.

METHODS:

A retrospective, single-institution cohort study was performed on patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from 2017 to 2021. Comparisons were made between 4,844 patients who received chewable, noncoated aspirin 81 mg and 4,388 patients who received enteric-coated 81 mg aspirin. Power analysis demonstrated 1,978 and 3,686 patients were needed per group to achieve a power of 80% for 90-day VTE rates (using inferiority testing) and GI complications (using superiority testing), respectively. Patients had similar baseline characteristics. Statistical analyses were done using t-tests and Chi-squared tests, with statistical significance defined as a P value < .05.

RESULTS:

There were no significant differences in the incidences of postoperative VTE (0.31% versus 0.55%; P = .111) or GI complications (0.14% versus 0.14%; P = 1.000) between patients who received either chewable or enteric-coated 81 mg aspirin bis in die in the overall comparison that included both THA and TKA patients combined, or THA patients alone. However, the VTE incidence for TKA patients alone was significantly lower with chewable than enteric-coated aspirin (0.22% versus 0.62%; P = .037), with no difference in GI complications (0.13% versus 0.19%; P = .277).

CONCLUSIONS:

Low-dose aspirin in enteric-coated formulation is inferior to chewable aspirin for VTE prophylaxis in primary TKA, but not inferior in THA patients. Both formulations have a similar GI complication rate. Therefore, it is reasonable to consider a transition from enteric-coated to uncoated chewable low-dose aspirin.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Arthroplasty Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Arthroplasty Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article