Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Lazertinib versus Platinum-Based Chemotherapy with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer after Failing EGFR-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor: A Real-World External Comparator Study.
Lee, Junho; Lee, Hyesung; Yoon, Dongwon; Choi, Eun-Young; Woo, Jieun; Jo, Bobae; Kim, Sohee; Shin, Ju-Young; Jung, Hyun Ae.
Afiliación
  • Lee J; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee H; School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea.
  • Yoon D; Department of Biohealth Regulatory Science, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea.
  • Choi EY; School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea.
  • Woo J; Department of Biohealth Regulatory Science, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea.
  • Jo B; School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim S; Department of Biohealth Regulatory Science, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea.
  • Shin JY; Yuhan Corporation, Seoul 06927, Republic of Korea.
  • Jung HA; Yuhan Corporation, Seoul 06927, Republic of Korea.
Cancers (Basel) ; 16(12)2024 Jun 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38927875
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Lazertinib is a third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR-TKI) that selectively inhibit common EGFR mutation and T790M mutation in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. No previous studies have compared lazertinib to platinum-based chemotherapy. We have compared lazertinib with platinum-based chemotherapy in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients after previous EGFR-TKI therapy.

METHODS:

We retrospectively compared 200 patients from LASER201, LASER301, and LASER-PMS studies to 334 patients who were treated with platinum-based chemotherapy after previous EGFR-TKI from the Samsung Medical Center. After propensity score matching (PSM), we selected 156 patients from each group. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS), with overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS:

The median follow-up of PFS was 15.61 months in the lazertinib group and 21.67 months in the external control group. The PFS was significantly longer in patients who were treated with lazertinib than those treated with platinum-based chemotherapy (10.97 months vs. 5.10 months; adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.40; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.29-0.55; p < 0.01) after PSM. Lazertinib showed superior OS (32.23 months vs. 18.73 months; adjusted HR 0.45; 95% CI, 0.29-0.69; p < 0.001), ORR (64.1% vs. 47.4%), and TTD (11.66 months vs. 6.73 months; adjusted HR 0.54; 95% CI, 0.39-0.75; p < 0.001) compared to platinum-based chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION:

Based on this retrospective, external control study, lazertinib has demonstrated significantly better efficacy compared with platinum-based chemotherapy. The external controls provide important context to evaluate efficacy in single-arm studies.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article