Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Contemporary Management of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection: The American College of Cardiology COGNITO Survey.
Lakkireddy, Dhanunjaya R; Rao, Archana; Theriot, Paul; Darden, Douglas; Pothineni, Naga Venkata K; Ram, Rashmi; Gao, Yu-Rong; Cheung, Jim W; Birgersdotter-Green, Ulrika.
Afiliación
  • Lakkireddy DR; Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute, HCA Midwest, Overland Park, Kansas, USA.
  • Rao A; Department of Cardiology, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
  • Theriot P; Enterprise Content & Digital Strategy Division, American College of Cardiology, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Darden D; Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute, HCA Midwest, Overland Park, Kansas, USA.
  • Pothineni NVK; Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute, HCA Midwest, Overland Park, Kansas, USA.
  • Ram R; Image Guided Therapy, Philips North American, Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA.
  • Gao YR; Image Guided Therapy, Philips North American, Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA.
  • Cheung JW; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, New York, USA.
  • Birgersdotter-Green U; Division of Cardiology, University of California-San Diego Health System, San Diego, California, USA.
JACC Adv ; 3(2): 100773, 2024 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38939375
ABSTRACT

Background:

Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) infection remains a serious complication, causing increased morbidity and mortality. Early recognition and escalation to definitive therapy including extraction of the infected device often pose challenges.

Objectives:

The purpose of this study was to assess U.S.-based physicians current practices in diagnosing and managing CIED infections and explore potential extraction barriers.

Methods:

An observational survey was performed by the American College of Cardiology including U.S. physicians managing CIEDs from February to March 2022. Sampling techniques and screener questions determined eligibility. The survey featured questions on knowledge and experience with CIED infection patients and case scenarios.

Results:

Of 387 physicians completing the survey (20% response rate), 49% indicated familiarity with current guidelines regarding CIED infection. Electrophysiologists (EPs) (91%) were more familiar with these guidelines, compared to non-EP cardiologists (29%) and primary care physicians (23%). Only 30% of physicians specified that their institution had guideline-based protocols in place for managing patients with CIED infection. When presented with pocket infection cases, approximately 89% of EPs and 50% of non-EP cardiologists would follow guideline recommendation to do complete CIED system removal, while 70% of primary care physicians did not recommend guideline-directed treatment.

Conclusions:

There are gaps in familiarity of guidelines as well as the knowledge in practical management of CIED infection with non-extracting physicians. Most institutions lack a definite pathway. Addressing discrepancies, including guideline education and streamlining care or referral pathways, will be a key factor to bridging the gap and improving CIED infection patient outcomes.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: JACC Adv Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: JACC Adv Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos