Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Periprosthetic Fractures: A Rising Tide of Hip Arthroplasty Failure Noted in the American Joint Replacement Registry and the Preventative Role of Cemented Stems.
Sassoon, Adam A; Taylor, Jeremiah M; Jimenez, Emily; Stancil, Ryan; Cannady, Darryl; De, Ayushmita.
Afiliación
  • Sassoon AA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
  • Taylor JM; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
  • Jimenez E; American Joint Replacement Registry, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rosemont, Illinois.
  • Stancil R; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
  • Cannady D; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
  • De A; American Joint Replacement Registry, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rosemont, Illinois.
J Arthroplasty ; 39(9S2): S454-S458, 2024 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38959986
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

This investigation examined cemented femoral component use in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and its impact on the incidence of periprosthetic fractures (PPFx), a common failure mode in THA. The study leverages data from the American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) to assess trends in cemented femoral component usage over time, its association with PPFx rates, and compares the survivorship and 90-day complication rates between cemented and cementless femoral component THAs.

METHODS:

Primary THAs, captured in the AJRR, in patients aged 65 years and older from 2012 to 2021 were analyzed. Variables considered included age, sex, race, region, teaching status, year, Charlson comorbidity index, and institution bed size. Analysis compared fixation types for THA on all-cause linked revision and PPFx. Logistic regression models analyzed the odds ratios for all-cause linked revision and PPFx for any follow-up time as well as for 90-day revision. The models were adjusted for the listed variables.

RESULTS:

During the study period, the rate of cement utilization as a percentage of primary THAs performed and reported to the AJRR increased from 4.4 to 8.3%. The rate of THA failure from PPFx increased from 11.4 to 33.3%. When both fixation groups were compared in the univariate analysis, there was a statistically significant difference in all demographic variables (P < .001). To account for this, multivariable logistic regression models were applied. In our models, cemented stems showed a 54.4% (odds ratio 0.456; 95% confidence interval 0.347 to 0.599; P < .0001) and 65.8% (odds ratio 0.342; 95% confidence interval 0.237 to 0.493; P < .0001) lower risk of PPFx linked and PPFx early linked revision, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

Periprosthetic fractures are becoming a leading failure mode for THAs in the AJRR. Given cemented fixation's relative resistance to this failure mode compared to cementless fixation, we should consider increasing the utilization of this technique.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Reoperación / Cementos para Huesos / Falla de Prótesis / Sistema de Registros / Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera / Fracturas Periprotésicas / Prótesis de Cadera Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Arthroplasty Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Reoperación / Cementos para Huesos / Falla de Prótesis / Sistema de Registros / Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera / Fracturas Periprotésicas / Prótesis de Cadera Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Arthroplasty Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article