Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient Participation in Multidisciplinary High-Risk Surgery Discussions: A Pilot Study.
Jones, Teresa S; Mckown, Lauren; Lane, Amber; Horney, Carolyn; Unruh, Morgan; Brown, Nathaniel; Sommerville-Henderson, Shala; Jones, Edward L; Albright, Karen; Levy, Cari; Robinson, Thomas.
Afiliación
  • Jones TS; Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
  • Mckown L; School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
  • Lane A; Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
  • Horney C; Seattle-Denver Center for Innovation (COIN), VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
  • Unruh M; Seattle-Denver Center for Innovation (COIN), VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
  • Brown N; Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
  • Sommerville-Henderson S; School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
  • Jones EL; Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
  • Albright K; School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
  • Levy C; Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
  • Robinson T; School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
J Palliat Med ; 27(7): 912-915, 2024 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38973547
ABSTRACT

Objective:

Our medical center implemented a multidisciplinary team to improve surgical decision making for high-risk older adults. To make this a patient-centric process, a pilot program included the patient and their family/caregiver(s) in these conversations. Our hypothesis is that multidisciplinary team discussions can improve difficult surgical decision making.

Methods:

From January to June 2022, we offered patients and their family participation in multidisciplinary discussions at a Veterans Affairs medical center. Semistructured interviews were conducted 1-6 days after the meeting. Interview transcripts were analyzed with qualitative mixed-methods approach.

Results:

Six patients and caregivers participated in the interviews. They found the discussion helpful for improving their understanding of the surgical decision. Out of these, 50% (3 of 6) of the patients changed their decision regarding the planned operation based on the discussion.

Conclusion:

Including patients and caregiver(s) in multidisciplinary surgical decision-making discussions resulted in half of the patients changing their surgical plans. This pilot study demonstrated both acceptance and feasibility for all participants.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Grupo de Atención al Paciente / Participación del Paciente / Toma de Decisiones Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Palliat Med Asunto de la revista: SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Grupo de Atención al Paciente / Participación del Paciente / Toma de Decisiones Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Palliat Med Asunto de la revista: SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos