Extra-articular proximal tibia fracture fixation with locked plating versus intramedullary nailing: A meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study compared outcomes of locked plating (LP) versus intramedullary nailing (IMN) techniques for treatment of extra-articular proximal-third tibia fractures. METHODS: Data Sources PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE STUDY SELECTION Studies were included if they compared LP and IMN fixation for proximal one third tibial shaft fractures without articular extension or with simple articular extension into the tibial plateau. Minimum 1 year of clinical and radiographic follow up was used. DATA EXTRACTION Outcomes assessed included operative duration, postoperative knee range of motion (ROM), union outcomes (time to union, nonunion, malunion, delayed union), and incidence of postoperative complications (superficial and deep infection, secondary surgical intervention, compartment syndrome). DATA SYNTHESIS: Separate random-effects meta-analyses were conducted for each outcome. For categorical data, relative risks were used whereas the standardized mean difference was used for continuous variables, with corresponding 95 % confidence intervals. RESULTS: 7 studies were included reporting the outcomes of 319 patients treated with LP and 300 treated with IMN. IMN fixation had significantly shorter time to union (p = 0.049) and lower risk for superficial infection (p = 0.028). However, LP conferred a significantly lower risk for malunion (p = 0.017) and postoperative compartment syndrome (p = 0.018). CONCLUSION: IMN demonstrated significantly shorter time to union and lower risk of superficial infection when treating extra-articular proximal tibia fractures, while LP fixation demonstrated significantly lower risk for malunion and postoperative compartment syndrome. Although successful results can be achieved with good technique in LP and IMN fixation, a significant complication profile exists with these fractures regardless of construct choice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level III.