Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The development of a performance evaluation index system for Chinese Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: a Delphi consensus study.
Sun, Huimin; Wang, Ying; Cai, Huanle; Wang, Pengyu; Jiang, Jie; Shi, Congxing; Wei, Yongyue; Hao, Yuantao.
Afiliación
  • Sun H; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
  • Wang Y; Department of Medical Statistics, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Cai H; Department of Medical Statistics, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Wang P; Department of Medical Statistics, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Jiang J; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
  • Shi C; Department of Medical Statistics, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Wei Y; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
  • Hao Y; Peking University Center for Public Health and Epidemic Preparedness & Response, Beijing, China.
Glob Health Res Policy ; 9(1): 28, 2024 07 23.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39044214
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The performance evaluation of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is crucial for enhancing the quality of public health services. With the ongoing reform of the CDC system in China, the existing performance evaluation system faces challenges. This study used the Delphi method to develop a new performance evaluation system for China's provincial, city, and county-level CDC.

METHODS:

Following the "Structure-Process-Outcome" model, assessment indicators were systematically collected. Indicators were modified and screened through two Delphi rounds based on CDC responsibilities, health development, and national policies. Twenty-four experts provided ratings and recommendations, and the research team evaluated questionnaire reliability, expert positivity, expert authority, and opinion consistency.

RESULTS:

The preliminary index system identified through the literature review and pre-survey included 11 primary, 30 secondary, and 64 tertiary indicators. After the first round of consultation, two secondary indicators and 11 tertiary indicators were removed and 22 tertiary indicators were added. After the second round of consultation, three secondary indicators and 11 tertiary indicators were removed and three tertiary indicators were added, at which point the p-value of the test for Kendall's coefficient of concordance W was < 0.001 and the coefficient of variation was within acceptable limits (< 0.25), so the consultation was concluded. The final index system included 11 primary, 25 secondary, and 67 tertiary indicators.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study responded to the CDC system reform by developing a comprehensive performance evaluation index system for provincial, city, and county-level CDC in China. The index system is both scientifically grounded and practical, serving as an effective tool for promoting the high-quality work of CDC organizations.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Técnica Delphi / Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud / Agencias Gubernamentales País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Glob Health Res Policy Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Técnica Delphi / Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud / Agencias Gubernamentales País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Glob Health Res Policy Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China